Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Mokote

A Basque bitter cultivar related in name to Moko and not reliably distinguished from it, used for the same purpose and in the same small quantity.

Also written Mokotea, Mokote Sagarra.

Classification
Bitter — Asturian technological blocks
Harvest
Late (Late October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Tannin and structure
Origin
Basque Country
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Good

How it is classified

Asturian technological blocks

Bitter · Amargo

Phenolics dominant, acid low. Asturias has few of these, and they are used sparingly.

The Consejo Regulador publishes a technological block only for varieties DOP Sidra de Asturias admits, and this fruit is not among them. The block here is CiderHQ reading descriptive sources against the Asturian definitions rather than a published characterisation, and is the weaker statement of the two.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninFirm
SugarModerate
BitternessModerate
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Bitter placement in Basque practice, with the caveat that the cultivar is not clearly separated from Moko in the record.

Drying and faintly bitter, as Moko is; the differences reported between them are small and not consistently reported.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Mokote, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Mokote into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Mokote. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Late
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Good

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

As for Moko.

About Mokote

Mokote is recorded separately from Moko because Basque orchard practice names it separately, and with an explicit statement that CiderHQ cannot tell them apart from the available record. The Basque suffix -te is augmentative, so the name reads roughly as "the big Moko", which is the kind of relationship that could describe a distinct cultivar, a size selection, or two names for one tree.

This is a recurring problem in the Atlantic cider regions and not a Basque peculiarity. The Fréquins in Normandy, the Duronas in Asturias, the Binets and the Locards are all families where descriptive names have multiplied faster than distinct cultivars. Modern identification work resolves such questions where it has been done; where it has not, the honest record is a record of the uncertainty.

Its use is the same as Moko’s: a small proportion of a blend, for the phenolic weight that Basque fruit otherwise lacks.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

The name is built on the same root as Moko with a Basque augmentative suffix, which suggests either a larger-fruited form of the same thing or a related selection. Neither is established.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.