Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Science

The datasets behind the numbers

Every measured figure on this site came from one of eleven programmes. These are the programmes: what each measured, where, when, by what method, and which of them may be read in one column with which.

CiderHQ holds 1,746 transcribed measurements across 326 cultivar records. None of them is averaged with any other, and this page exists to explain why that is a decision rather than an omission.

Kingston Black, measured four timesOne cultivar, four measurement programmes, four sets of numbers — and the fourth is not a juice analysis at all. This is why CiderHQ never averages across studies.Kingston BlackThe same cultivar, at four programmesWSU Mount VernonSkagit Valley, Washington · 2002–2017 · juicepH3.51Total acid0.61% w/vTotal tannin0.15% w/vSugar13.3 °BxUSDA-PGRU GenevaFinger Lakes, New York · 2017 · juicepH4.23Titratable acidity2.1 g/LTotal phenolics1,080 mg/LSugar12.5 °BxLong AshtonSomerset, England · 1905–1975 · juiceTotal acid0.58% w/vTotal tannin0.20% w/vGeneva, New Yorklate 1970s · finished cider, not juiceFinished pH3.56Finished total tannin0.062% w/vFermentation and fining removedphenolic material. Not a disagreementwith the three above.Three juice pH values, 3.51 to 4.23.None of them is wrong.
One cultivar, four measurement programmes, four sets of numbers — and the fourth is not a juice analysis at all. This is why CiderHQ never averages across studies.
Described in full
Shape
Four stacked panels, one per programme, each naming the place, the period and the substrate that was analysed. Within each panel the figures that programme published for Kingston Black are listed with their units. The fourth panel is set apart by a dashed border and a heading that reads "finished cider, not juice".
WSU Mount Vernon, Skagit Valley, Washington, 2002–2017, juice
pH 3.51, total acid 0.61% w/v, total tannin 0.15% w/v, specific gravity 1.055, 13.3 °Bx. A maritime North American site chosen as the closest analogue to the English West Country, averaged across the seasons the cultivar was in trial.
USDA-PGRU Geneva, New York, 2017, juice
pH 4.23, titratable acidity 2.1 g/L, total phenolics 1,080 mg/L, 12.5 °Bx. One season, one harvest, in a continental climate with hotter summers and colder winters than the Skagit Valley. The pH is 0.72 units above the Mount Vernon figure for the same cultivar.
Long Ashton, Somerset, 1905–1975, juice
Total acid 0.58% w/v, total tannin 0.20% w/v. A seventy-year composite from the station whose figures underlie the English classification. Its tannin figure is a third higher than Mount Vernon’s for the same fruit.
Geneva, New York, late 1970s, finished cider
Finished pH 3.56, finished total acid 0.58% w/v, finished total tannin 0.062% w/v. Set apart because it is a different quantity with the same name: fermentation, fining and time remove phenolic material, so this tannin figure is roughly a third of the Long Ashton juice figure and cannot be read as disagreeing with it.
What the figure argues
The pH spread across the three juice analyses is 3.51 to 4.23, which is large enough to change what a maker would do about it, and none of the three is an error. A measurement is a statement about a fruit and a place and a season and a method. Averaging the four would produce a number that no orchard ever grew and no laboratory ever measured.

Why the same fruit has four different numbers

Kingston Black is the most analysed cider apple in the English-speaking world, and four of the programmes below measured it. Its juice pH comes out at 3.51 in the Skagit Valley and 4.23 in the Finger Lakes — a difference large enough to change what a maker would do about it. Neither figure is wrong. They are measurements of different trees, in different climates, in different years.

The fourth figure is subtler and more dangerous. Geneva’s 3.56 looks like a tiebreaker between the other two, and it is not a juice measurement at all: it was taken on finished cider, after a fermentation had consumed acid and a fining had stripped phenolics. Put in one column with the others it would look like corroboration. It is a different quantity with the same name.

That is the failure these pages exist to prevent. A figure without its programme is not a fact about a fruit; it is a fact about an orchard, a season, a laboratory and an assay, and CiderHQ publishes all four.

The eleven programmes

Ordered by how much of the site rests on them.

Every measurement programme transcribed on CiderHQ
DatasetWhereWhenCultivarsMeasurements
The DOP Sidra de Asturias varietal characterisationAsturiasPublished characterisation, retrieved 2026-08-2456114
The Long Ashton cider apple tableLong Ashton Research Station1905–19754386
The Three Counties perry pear surveyGloucestershire2022–202438308
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit201747560
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialNorthwestern Washington Research and Extension Center2002–201746311
The Geneva finished-cider analysesNew York State Agricultural Experiment Stationlate 1970s1763
The IFPC cider apple juice characterisationFrance — orchards supplying the Institut Français des Productions Cidricoles20181248
The Klosterneuburg Mostbirnen trialVersuchsgut Haschhof2007–20081364
The Long Ashton perry pear analysesLong Ashton Research Station1903–19631957
The Virginia polyphenol characterisationWinchester2012–20131768
Typical English apple juice analysesEngland — the compilation does not name the orchards1922–19771867

What these pages are not

Not a republication

CiderHQ transcribes the figures it can use and explains the programmes that produced them. It does not republish a dataset in bulk, and it does not host anybody’s data. Each page names its source and links to it; where a figure was withheld — because the source printed something impossible, or because its unit is unstated — the page says so and gives the published figure and the reason, rather than quietly dropping it.

The rule the whole evidence layer works to is set out in how evidence is handled. In short: a number is stored in the convention its source published it in, converted never, and grouped only with numbers that measured the same thing the same way.