Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Orchards

Tree age and juice quality

Does the age of the tree change the juice?

In short

In perry pears it does, and it is documented. The compiler of the Long Ashton perry pear analyses attached a warning to the whole table: juice quality improves markedly with tree age, and young trees give weaker acid, weaker tannin and a much lower specific gravity.

For two varieties the station published both figures. Barland from young trees measured 1.038 gravity and 0.26 per cent tannin; from old trees, 1.058 and 2.6 per cent tannin. Green Longdon went from 1.6 grams per litre of acid on young trees to 4.8 on old ones.

The effect is much less discussed in cider apples, and CiderHQ has found no equivalent published pairing for one. That is a gap in the evidence rather than evidence of absence.

Perry pear juice: the nitrogen a yeast can use, and the nitrogen it cannotEight perry pear varieties measured in the Three Counties. The solid bars are assimilable nitrogen; the dashed bars are proline, which yeast cannot take up without oxygen. They do not move together.Usable nitrogenProline — unusableGreen Roller70.6133.4Felix69.7164.3Betty Prosser49.2269.9Barland24.8145.6Butt13.317.9Moorcroft6.3123.1Red Pear3.742.8Tumper1337.2Solid bars: free amino nitrogen, mg N/L.Dashed bars: proline, mg/L — an amino acidyeast cannot use without oxygen.
Eight perry pear varieties measured in the Three Counties. The solid bars are assimilable nitrogen; the dashed bars are proline, which yeast cannot take up without oxygen. They do not move together.
Described in full
Shape
Eight named rows, each with two horizontal bars. The solid bar on the left is free amino nitrogen in milligrams of nitrogen per litre, on a scale to 80. The dashed bar on the right is proline in milligrams per litre, on a wider scale to 360. Each bar carries its figure as a number beside it.
The figures
Green Roller 70.6 and 133.4; Felix 69.7 and 164.3; Betty Prosser 49.2 and 269.9; Barland 24.8 and 145.6; Butt 13.3 and 17.9; Moorcroft 6.3 and 123.1; Red Pear 3.7 and 42.8; Tumper 1.0 and 337.2. All are single samples from a survey of Three Counties fruit taken between 2022 and 2024.
Why proline is separated
Proline is an amino acid, and any measurement of total amino acids counts it. A yeast fermenting anaerobically cannot assimilate it, because the enzyme that opens the proline ring requires molecular oxygen. So a juice can be rich in amino acids and starved of usable nitrogen at the same time.
Tumper
The extreme case, and the reason the figure exists. One milligram per litre of usable nitrogen beside 337 of proline — a ratio of more than three hundred to one. A total amino acid figure would describe that juice as well supplied. It is not, and a ferment on it alone has effectively nothing to eat.
The two do not track
Butt is low in both. Moorcroft is low in one and high in the other. Green Roller is high in both. There is no relationship visible here that would let a maker infer one figure from the other, which is why the survey reports them separately and why this figure does.
Scope
Eight varieties out of thirty-eight surveyed, chosen to span the range rather than sampled at random. Every figure is one juice from one collection in one autumn: the same survey found the same variety differing markedly between years and between tree types.

What the Long Ashton figures actually show

The Barland pairing is the striking one: a tenfold difference in tannin and a twentyfold difference in gravity units between juice from young and old trees of the same variety on the same station. If those two figures arrived without their labels they would be read as two different cultivars.

The Brandy row shows the effect is not uniform. Its gravity rises with age as the others do, and its acid falls rather than rising. Whatever is happening is not a single mechanism operating in one direction on every property.

Long Ashton perry pear analyses where the station published young-tree and old-tree figures separately.
VarietyYoung treesOld trees
BarlandSG 1.038, acid 3.8 g/L, tannin 0.26 g/LSG 1.058, acid 9.2 g/L, tannin 2.6 g/L
BrandySG 1.046, acid 1.4 g/LSG 1.069, acid 0.4 g/L
Green LongdonSG 1.040, acid 1.6 g/L, tannin 0.6 g/LSG 1.057, acid 4.8 g/L, tannin 1.9 g/L

What the modern survey adds

A Three Counties survey of perry pear juice run between 2022 and 2024 sampled several varieties more than once, and where it sampled the same variety from different tree types the differences are large. Hendre Huffcap from bush trees measured 3.0 grams per litre of acid and 460 milligrams per litre of total phenolics; Hendre Huffcap from standard trees, in the same month of the same year, measured 8.4 grams per litre of acid and 1 140 milligrams per litre of phenolics.

Bush trees and standard trees are not simply young and old — a bush tree on a dwarfing rootstock will never become a standard — but the direction agrees with what Long Ashton reported, and the size of the difference is comparable.

The survey also found large differences between seasons on what may have been the same trees. Oldfield measured 690 milligrams per litre of true tannin in 2022 and 3 000 in 2024. Whatever share of that belongs to tree age, a good deal of it does not.

Why it might happen

What it means for reading any perry pear figure

Every historic perry pear analysis on this site carries a caveat naming this problem, because the compiler of those figures thought it important enough to attach to the whole table and because the effect is large enough to matter more than the difference between many varieties.

It also affects how a new orchard should be read. A grower planting perry pears will get juice for years before getting the juice the variety is known for, and a bench trial run on fruit from young trees is not a trial of the variety.

And it is a reason the traditional standard perry pear orchard is not merely picturesque. A pear tree that takes thirty years to come into full bearing and then crops for two centuries is producing its characteristic juice for most of a very long life; the same variety in a modern bush planting may be replaced before it ever gets there.

What is not knownNo source CiderHQ has reached publishes a young-tree and old-tree pairing for a cider apple. Whether the effect is as strong in apples as in pears is genuinely open, and the silence in the apple literature should not be read either way.

Also answered on this page

Questions this page covers, so you can tell at a glance whether it is the one you want.

Related

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Where to go next