Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Carisi

A tannic Domfrontais poiré pear, one of the cultivars that gives the region’s blends structure.

Also written Carisy, Poire Carisi.

Classification
Bittersweet — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Tannin and structure, Bittersweet base
Origin
The Domfrontais, southern Normandy
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Bittersweet

Low acid with substantial tannin — the class that gives perry grip.

Mapped from French descriptions of a tannic, low-acid pear onto the English scheme.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninFirm
SugarModerate
BitternessModerate
AstringencyDrying
AromaRestrained
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

French descriptive material on a tannic poiré pear.

A drying juice with little acidity, used in small proportion for grip.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Carisi, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Carisi into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Carisi. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

October in the Domfrontais.

Mid-season. Self-incompatible.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

A blend component only.

About Carisi

Carisi is one of several tannic pears grown in the Domfrontais in small numbers to give the region’s poiré some structure. Its spelling varies between records — Carisi, Carisy — which is the same instability that produces Barland and Bareland, or Winnal’s and Winnall’s, in English perry pear lists. Locally transmitted names get written down by different people at different times.

The juice is low in acid with substantial tannin, and it is used in modest proportion. Domfrontais poiré is not a tannic drink; the tannin is there to stop a sweet, aromatic, low-alcohol liquid from being merely sweet, and a little of it goes a long way.

What is documented about this cultivar is thin, and this record reflects that rather than filling the space. The Domfrontais cultivars other than Plant de Blanc are described in the French technical literature in less detail than the major English perry pears are in theirs, and pretending otherwise would misrepresent the evidence.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Local tradition, undocumented. Spelling varies between records, as it does for most locally named fruit.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Styles it is characteristic of

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.