Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Alcohol and health

Strong white cider and public health

What was the strong white cider problem, and what happened to it?

In short

Strong white cider was a category of pale, high-strength cider — typically around 7.5 per cent ABV and sold in large plastic bottles — that delivered a great deal of alcohol for very little money.

It became a public-health concern because of that ratio. Health bodies and homelessness and addiction services identified it as disproportionately associated with dependent and harmful drinking, particularly among street drinkers and among young people.

The policy response came through pricing and duty rather than through prohibition: minimum unit pricing in Scotland and Wales, and changes to the United Kingdom’s alcohol duty structure, altered the economics that had produced the category.

What the product was

The category was defined less by any tradition than by a commercial formula: a pale, minimally flavoured cider at a strength around 7.5 per cent, made with a high proportion of concentrate and water rather than fresh-pressed juice, and sold in two- and three-litre plastic bottles at a very low price.

A three-litre bottle at 7.5 per cent contains 22.5 UK units. That is substantially more than the 14 units a week that the UK Chief Medical Officers give as their low-risk figure, in a single container that could be bought for a few pounds.

The strength was not incidental. The United Kingdom’s pre-2023 cider duty structure taxed cider by volume within broad strength bands rather than by alcohol content, which meant that within a band, a stronger product carried the same duty as a weaker one. Producing at the top of a band was therefore the most duty-efficient way to sell alcohol.

The result was a product whose defining characteristic, from a public-health point of view, was its cost per unit of alcohol rather than anything about how it tasted.

Why it drew attention

Alcohol treatment services, homelessness organisations and public-health bodies in the United Kingdom repeatedly identified white cider as the drink most associated with the most severe patterns of dependent drinking. The reason given was consistently the price per unit: for someone drinking dependently and with very little money, it was the cheapest available route to alcohol.

The concern was reinforced by the association with young people, for whom cheapness is a particularly strong determinant of what is drunk, and by the large-format packaging, which does not lend itself to measured consumption.

The category also became a reputational problem for cider producers generally, since the products carried the name of a drink with which they had little in common in production terms, and traditional producers were among those arguing for a change in the duty structure.

Cheapness per unit is the mechanism, not strength aloneThe public-health argument here was never that strong cider is inherently worse than other strong drinks. A high-strength traditional cider at the same ABV was not the subject of the concern. What made this category distinctive was the quantity of alcohol obtainable for a very small sum, and that is the variable the policy response targeted.

The policy response

Scotland introduced minimum unit pricing in May 2018, setting a floor price per unit of alcohol. Wales followed in March 2020. The measures set a legal minimum below which alcohol may not be sold, and by construction they raise the price of the cheapest, strongest products by the greatest proportion while leaving most drinks untouched.

The United Kingdom reformed its alcohol duty system in August 2023, moving to a structure in which duty is charged by reference to the alcohol content of the product across all categories, with reliefs for draught products and for small producers. That change removed the specific incentive to produce at the top of a wide strength band.

Some retailers and producers acted independently ahead of legislation, withdrawing large-format high-strength ciders from sale or reformulating them to lower strengths.

The combined effect was a substantial change in what is on sale. CiderHQ does not publish an assessment of the outcomes of these measures, because the evaluation literature is a public-health research field of its own and is outside what this site’s source register can support.

What CiderHQ does and does not say about it

It states the facts of the category, the reason it became a policy concern, and what was done. Those are matters of record and readers ask about them.

It does not adjudicate the effectiveness of minimum unit pricing, which is a live question in public-health research and one on which this site has no competence.

It does not use the episode to distinguish "proper" cider from the products in question in a way that implies the former is harmless. The alcohol in a traditional cider at 7.5 per cent is the same molecule at the same strength, and the World Health Organization’s position that no level of alcohol consumption is safe for health applies to both.

It names no brands, here or anywhere else on the site.

Also answered on this page

Questions this page covers, so you can tell at a glance whether it is the one you want.

Related

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

What this page is

A description of what is known, written for readers of legal drinking age. It is not medical advice and it is not an encouragement to drink. CiderHQ publishes no health benefits for alcohol, because current guidance from the major health authorities does not support them. For advice about your own drinking, speak to your national health service. Our policy on alcohol.

Where to go next