Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

History · Nineteenth century to present

Why perry declined

Why is perry so much rarer than cider?

In short

Every stage of making perry is harder than the equivalent stage for cider. The trees take a generation to bear and grow too large to manage or harvest conveniently, the fruit ripens and rots within days, and the juice is prone to problems that cider juice rarely presents.

Those difficulties were tolerable while rural labour was cheap and plentiful. When it was not, perry orchards were the first thing to go. The commercial redefinition of the word in the twentieth century, and the later marketing of ‘pear cider’, then detached the name from the fruit.

The tree is the first problem

A traditional perry pear is a forest-sized tree. It may reach fifteen metres, live for two hundred years or more, and take a decade and a half to give a worthwhile crop. Nothing about that suits twentieth-century agriculture, which wanted early returns, small trees and access for machinery.

Harvesting compounds it. Fruit forty feet up cannot be picked by hand from a ladder in any economic way, so perry pears were traditionally shaken down or allowed to fall and then gathered from the ground — work that needs many hands over a short period.

Cider apples faced the same pressures but had an escape route. Apple growing had dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstocks, developed and tested through the twentieth century, allowing bush orchards that crop within a few years and can be machine harvested. Equivalent options for perry pears were far more limited, and the crop could not make the same transition.

The narrow window and the difficult juice

Perry pears ripen from the inside. The traditional guidance is to pick when the first fruit falls, and the interval between a pear that will not press and a pear that has broken down internally can be a matter of days. Where cider fruit can wait in heaps for weeks, perry fruit cannot.

The juice then behaves awkwardly. Perry pears carry citric acid as well as malic, are high in tannin and stone cells, and contain substantial sorbitol, which yeast does not ferment and which leaves a sweetness that has to be accounted for. Perry is more prone than cider to certain spoilage problems, and a batch can be lost late.

None of this is insurmountable — perry is made successfully every year — but it means that perry rewards attention and punishes neglect, in an industry that was moving towards scale and standardisation.

When the labour went

The perry orchard was viable as part of a farming system with a resident workforce that could be directed to gathering fruit for a fortnight in September. The movement of that workforce off the land through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries removed the condition on which the crop depended.

Nothing replaced it. A perry orchard could not be mechanised in the way an apple orchard could, and its returns did not justify hiring seasonal labour at market rates. Farms let the trees stand and stopped gathering from them, then removed them when the ground was wanted.

The post-war grubbing-up grants finished a process already well advanced. Old perry orchards were among the clearest cases for removal: large trees, low yields, no prospect of renewal, and land that could carry something else.

The word comes loose from the fruit

Through the twentieth century a substantial commercial perry trade existed, but its relationship to perry pears was loose. The best-known example is the sparkling perry launched by a Somerset firm in the early 1950s and marketed heavily, including on early British commercial television; it was a manufactured drink sold on presentation rather than on orchard provenance.

From the mid-2000s the term ‘pear cider’ was adopted by large producers for pear-based drinks, frequently made from concentrate and often from culinary or dessert pears rather than perry pears. British duty law treats perry and pear cider as the same category, so the label carried no obligation to use perry fruit.

The result is a real difficulty for a reader. A traditional perry made from named perry pears in Gloucestershire and a mass-market pear drink can occupy the same shelf under closely related names, and specialist organisations have campaigned for the distinction to be visible. CiderHQ treats the two as different products and describes what is in each rather than arguing about the word.

Perry and pear ciderThe distinction that matters is the fruit. Perry in the traditional sense is made from perry pears; drinks labelled pear cider are frequently made from dessert or culinary pears, or from concentrate. British duty categories do not separate them.

How this developed

Certainty is marked on each entry. Where the popular account runs ahead of the evidence, that is said rather than smoothed over.

  1. Nineteenth century· probable

    Orchards age without replanting

    Perry orchards are not renewed as farming systems change and the returns fall behind alternatives.

  2. Early to mid twentieth century· probable

    The labour disappears

    The seasonal workforce that gathered perry fruit leaves the land, and the crop loses its economic basis.

  3. Early 1950s

    A manufactured perry reaches a mass market

    A heavily marketed sparkling perry establishes the word in British consumers’ minds as a branded product rather than an orchard drink.

  4. 1950s–1980s

    Grubbing up

    Grant-aided orchard clearance removes large numbers of old perry trees, which were among the least defensible to retain on economic grounds.

  5. From the mid-2000s

    ‘Pear cider’

    Large producers adopt the term for pear drinks often made from concentrate, and the name is separated from perry fruit in the market.

Also answered on this page

Questions this page covers, so you can tell at a glance whether it is the one you want.

Related

Places

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Where to go next