Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Red Horse

A red-fruited counterpart to Green Horse, known from fewer trees and described as giving a slightly softer juice.

Also written Red Horse Pear.

Classification
Medium sharp — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Bulk juice, Acid lift
Origin
Herefordshire and the Welsh border
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Medium sharp

Moderate acid with low to moderate tannin.

Placed from descriptive material. Some accounts describe it as softer and sweeter than Green Horse, which would move it towards the sweet class; the difference is not resolved.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Descriptive material only, with wide bands reflecting the unresolved question of how it differs from Green Horse.

Large red-flushed fruit giving a juice reported as milder than Green Horse, with light acid and little tannin.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Red Horse, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Red Horse into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Red Horse. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Late September into October.

Mid-season. Self-incompatible.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

No established single-variety tradition, and too few trees to support one.

About Red Horse

Red Horse is the red-fruited pear of the Horse pair, and it is much the less common of the two. Where Green Horse survives in reasonable numbers in Herefordshire and Monmouthshire orchards, Red Horse is known from few trees, and most of what is said about it is said by comparison with its green counterpart rather than on its own evidence.

The juice is described as milder — lighter in acid, still low in tannin — which would place it at the boundary between the medium-sharp and sweet classes. CiderHQ places it as medium sharp and records that the distinction is unresolved rather than choosing between two descriptions neither of which rests on an analysis.

The pattern here is worth naming, because it recurs across this file. A well-known perry pear and a scarce relative share a name element; the scarce one is described in terms of the well-known one; and the description hardens into fact by repetition. Where the underlying evidence is a handful of trees and a few lines of text, the record should say so.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Unrecorded. The Horse element again indicates a large fruit.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.