Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Startlecock

A Gloucestershire perry pear whose name belongs to the group describing the effects of the drink, and which survives in small numbers.

Also written Startle Cock, Startlecock Pear.

Classification
Medium sharp — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Bulk juice, Acid lift
Origin
Gloucestershire
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Medium sharp

Moderate acid with low to moderate tannin.

Placed from descriptive material. The cultivar has not been analysed in any source CiderHQ has verified.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Descriptive material from the national collection; the bands are wide because the evidence is thin.

A moderately sharp juice with light tannin, described rather than analysed.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Startlecock, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Startlecock into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Startlecock. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Late September into October, with the short window normal for the fruit.

Mid-season. Self-incompatible.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

No established single-variety tradition; too few trees for one to have formed.

About Startlecock

Startlecock belongs to a small cluster of Three Counties perry pear names — Merrylegs, Mumblehead, Lightning, Startlecock — that describe what the perry was held to do to whoever drank it. The cluster is genuinely interesting as ethnography. It records that perry was a daily drink in these parishes rather than an occasional one, that its effects were a matter of common observation, and that the way a farming community distinguished one tree from another was often by the reputation of the liquid rather than by the shape of the fruit.

It is not, however, evidence about the pear. The names cannot be used to infer strength or character, and the cultivars in the group are not notably alike. Startlecock itself is known from few trees in Gloucestershire, has not been analysed in any source CiderHQ has verified, and is described as a medium-sharp perry pear of no particular distinction. That is the honest extent of what can be said.

The tree is an ordinary perry pear standard. What is worth recording is that a cultivar of this kind survives at all: a pear with no commercial value, few trees, and a name that outlasted almost everything else about it.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Unrecorded. The name is one of a cluster of Three Counties perry pear names describing what the perry was held to do to the drinker.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.