Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Yellow Huffcap

A second member of the Huffcap group, distinguished from Hendre Huffcap by fruit colour and shape in the collections and routinely confused with it in the field.

Also written Yellow Huff Cap.

Classification
Medium sharp — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Early (September)
Single varietal
Sometimes bottled on its own
Blend role
Acid lift, Early season
Origin
The Herefordshire and Monmouthshire border country
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Medium sharp

Moderate acid with low to moderate tannin.

Placed with the medium-sharp Huffcaps. Because the group has not been analysed cultivar by cultivar in any source CiderHQ has verified, this placement carries the group’s description rather than an analysis of this fruit.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidHigh
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: its recorded classification

Descriptive accounts of the Huffcap group rather than an analysis of this cultivar. The confidence is set accordingly. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.

A long yellow pear giving a moderately sharp juice with light tannin, close enough to Hendre Huffcap that few tasters separate the two blind.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Yellow Huffcap, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Yellow Huffcap into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Specific gravity1.064 SG

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England, 1903–1963 · Juice density. Published by the source in the four-figure form (1058) and written here in full. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

Long Ashton perry pear analyses, reaching CiderHQ through a National Association of Cider Makers report compiled in 2010 from the station’s material. The underlying volume is Luckwill and Pollard, Perry Pears (University of Bristol, 1963), which CiderHQ has verified bibliographically and not opened. The compiler warns that juice quality in perry pears improves markedly with tree age, and that young trees give weaker acid and tannin and a lower gravity. A single figure for a perry pear is therefore a figure for a tree of some unstated age.

Juice density, the practical proxy for sugar before fermentation. Measured in specific gravity.

Titratable acidity6.2 g/L

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England, 1903–1963 · Titration, reported as malic acid. Published as a percentage and stored here in grams per litre by exact conversion — one per cent weight per volume is ten grams per litre — so that the historic figures sit in one column with the modern survey the site also holds. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

Long Ashton perry pear analyses, reaching CiderHQ through a National Association of Cider Makers report compiled in 2010 from the station’s material. The underlying volume is Luckwill and Pollard, Perry Pears (University of Bristol, 1963), which CiderHQ has verified bibliographically and not opened. The compiler warns that juice quality in perry pears improves markedly with tree age, and that young trees give weaker acid and tannin and a lower gravity. A single figure for a perry pear is therefore a figure for a tree of some unstated age.

Acid measured by neutralisation — the quantity of acid, not its strength. Measured in grams per litre.

Total tannin100.0 mg/L

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England, 1903–1963 · Löwenthal permanganate titration. Published as a percentage and stored here in milligrams per litre by exact conversion — one per cent weight per volume is ten thousand milligrams per litre — so that the historic figures sit in one column with the modern survey the site also holds. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

Long Ashton perry pear analyses, reaching CiderHQ through a National Association of Cider Makers report compiled in 2010 from the station’s material. The underlying volume is Luckwill and Pollard, Perry Pears (University of Bristol, 1963), which CiderHQ has verified bibliographically and not opened. A permanganate figure, not comparable with a Folin–Ciocalteu total-phenolics figure.

The phenolic fraction responsible for bitterness and astringency. Measured in milligrams per litre.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Long Ashton perry pear varieties

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England · 1903–1963 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

Maritime and mild. The station sat outside the perry counties it studied — the pears are Gloucestershire, Herefordshire and Worcestershire fruit — which is worth holding in mind when a figure here is compared with one measured on fruit picked in the Three Counties.

Harvest
First to third week of October; rots if not shaken before ripe
Growth habit
Very large
Bearing
Heavy, biennial
Held as
Listed as “Yellow Huffcap”
Tasted at this site

Medium to high acidity, low tannin, fruity, full flavoured and consistently good or excellent quality.

Recorded by the programme from professional cidermakers in the region. One panel, one place, one set of seasons — a description of these ciders rather than of the cultivar everywhere.

Juice analysis: specific gravity, acidity by titration as malic acid, tannin by Löwenthal permanganate titration. Acid and tannin are published as percentages and stored here in grams per litre by exact conversion. Vigour, cropping habit, maturity window and a vintage quality assessment are the compiler’s summary of the station’s descriptions.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Early
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Mid-September onwards. Like the rest of the group it is picked up from the ground and milled at once. The National Perry Pear Collection records it ripening in the first half of October at Hartpury, one band later than the early window recorded here.

Mid-season. Self-incompatible.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Ripening moves with the site and the season. Where the National Perry Pear Collection’s observation at Hartpury falls in a different band from the window recorded here, both are kept rather than one overwriting the other.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Sometimes bottled on its own

Made single-variety occasionally. Whether a bottle labelled Yellow Huffcap contains this cultivar rather than another Huffcap depends entirely on the accuracy of the orchard record it came from.

About Yellow Huffcap

Yellow Huffcap exists as a record in the national collection and as a doubt in the field. It is one of several long, tapering perry pears carrying the Huffcap name, distinguished from Hendre Huffcap on fruit colour and shape, and separated from it more confidently in a collection where both are grown side by side than in an orchard where only one is present.

The difficulty is not carelessness. Perry pears change colour as they ripen, the ripening window is a matter of days, and the people who named these trees were describing fruit in front of them rather than establishing a taxonomy. A yellow Huffcap and a green Huffcap may be the same tree seen a week apart. Where two names are recorded from two parishes, there is often no way now to tell whether that reflects two cultivars or two habits of speech.

What can be said is that the juice belongs with the medium-sharp perry pears: moderate acidity, light tannin, a clean ferment, and enough freshness to be useful early in the season. Anyone wanting more precision than that should be told plainly that the record does not support it, which is the more useful answer.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Origin unrecorded. The Huffcap names were applied by growers to fruit of a particular shape, and no individual Huffcap has a documented raising.

Other names this fruit is known by. Each is a name for the same cultivar, not a separate one — which is why none of them has a page of its own.
NameKindNote
Black HuffcapDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records this name for Yellow Huffcap, and also for Rock — a variety the collection holds as distinct and has separated by DNA.
Brown HuffcapDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records this name for Yellow Huffcap, and also for Rock — a variety the collection holds as distinct and has separated by DNA.
Chandos HuffcapRegional nameRecorded as a synonym of Yellow Huffcap by the National Perry Pear Collection.
HuffcapDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records this name for Yellow Huffcap, and also for Rock — a variety the collection holds as distinct and has separated by DNA.
King's ArmsRegional nameRecorded as a synonym of Yellow Huffcap by the National Perry Pear Collection.
Kings ArmsRegional nameRecorded as a synonym of Yellow Huffcap by the National Perry Pear Collection.
UffcapDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records this name for Yellow Huffcap, and also for Rock — a variety the collection holds as distinct and has separated by DNA.
UffcupDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records this name for Yellow Huffcap, and also for Rock — a variety the collection holds as distinct and has separated by DNA.
Yellow LongdonDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records Yellow Longdon as a name for Yellow Huffcap. CiderHQ holds Yellow Longdon as a variety in its own right, so the two accounts disagree about whether this is one fruit or two. The Collection’s identifications are supported by DNA analysis of the trees it holds, which makes it the stronger source — but nothing available here settles the question, so both records stand and the equation is marked as contested rather than adopted.
Yellow LonglandDisputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records Yellow Longland as a name for Yellow Huffcap. CiderHQ holds Yellow Longdon as a variety in its own right, so the two accounts disagree about whether this is one fruit or two. The Collection’s identifications are supported by DNA analysis of the trees it holds, which makes it the stronger source — but nothing available here settles the question, so both records stand and the equation is marked as contested rather than adopted.
Yellow Longland(s)Disputed identityThe National Perry Pear Collection records Yellow Longland(s) as a name for Yellow Huffcap. CiderHQ holds Yellow Longdon as a variety in its own right, so the two accounts disagree about whether this is one fruit or two. The Collection’s identifications are supported by DNA analysis of the trees it holds, which makes it the stronger source — but nothing available here settles the question, so both records stand and the equation is marked as contested rather than adopted.
Hendre HuffcapDisputed identityTreated as the same fruit in some accounts and as distinct in others. The national collection holds them separately; field identification frequently does not.
Green HuffcapDisputed identityA further Huffcap name whose relationship to this one is unresolved. Colour terms in perry pear names describe fruit that changes colour as it ripens, which is part of the problem.

The National Perry Pear Collection’s identifications are supported by DNA analysis of the trees it holds, which is why they are treated here as the stronger account where they conflict with a documentary one. Where the collection records a name for two varieties it holds as distinct, the name identifies a group of trees rather than one variety, and fruit offered under it needs checking against something other than its label.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Styles it is characteristic of

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.