Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Yellow Longdon

The fourth of the Longdon pears, known from few trees and described as giving a moderately sharp juice of no great distinction.

Also written Longdon Yellow.

Classification
Medium sharp — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Bulk juice, Acid lift
Origin
Longdon, Worcestershire
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Medium sharp

Moderate acid with low to moderate tannin.

Placed with the medium-sharp pears on descriptive grounds. The evidential basis for this cultivar is thin and the placement should be read as provisional.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Thin descriptive material only. The bands are wide because the evidence does not support narrower ones.

A yellow-skinned pear giving a moderately sharp juice; the published description does not go much beyond that, and neither should this record.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Yellow Longdon, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Yellow Longdon into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Yellow Longdon. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Late September into October, on the limited evidence available.

Presumed mid-season and self-incompatible, in line with the group.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

No tradition of single-variety use, and too few trees for one to have developed.

About Yellow Longdon

Yellow Longdon is the least known of the four Longdon pears, and this record is deliberately short because the evidence is. It is held in the national collection, it survives in a small number of trees, and it is described as a yellow-skinned pear of moderate acidity. Beyond that, the honest answer is that not much is documented.

That is worth stating plainly rather than padding. A great deal of writing about perry pears fills gaps of this kind with inference dressed as description, and the result is a literature in which cultivars known from three trees are described as confidently as cultivars analysed at Long Ashton. CiderHQ marks the difference: the blend profile on this record carries wide bands and a confidence of "described" because that is what the material supports.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Parish tradition only.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.