Cider apple
Black Twig
A firm, late-keeping upland southern apple with unusually assertive tannin for American fruit, valued by revival makers for the grip it brings to a blend.
Also written Blacktwig, Black Twig, Arkansas.
- Classification
- Not classified under any recorded system
- Harvest
- Very late (November onwards)
- Single varietal
- Sometimes bottled on its own
- Blend role
- Tannin and structure, Late season, Sugar and body
- Origin
- Tennessee, with a competing claim from Arkansas
- Species
- Malus domestica
- Vigour
- Vigorous
- Biennial bearing
- Slightly biennial
- Keeping
- Very good — holds in store for weeks
- Evidence
- Analysed in 2 sources, watched at 2 trial sites
How it is classified
No classification scheme has been recorded for Black Twig. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.
What it contributes to a blend
A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished drink will be.
| Axis | Typical | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acid | Moderate | |
| Tannin | Moderate | |
| Sugar | Moderate | |
| Bitterness | Moderate | |
| Astringency | Noticeable | |
| Aroma | Present | |
| Body | Full |
Consistent modern maker testimony that Black Twig contributes noticeable astringency, plus historic description of a hard, tannic, long-keeping fruit. No juice analysis is held in CiderHQ’s register, so the profile is marked described rather than measured. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.
Hard, dense and frankly astringent from the tree, mellowing in store into a juice with real grip behind moderate acid.
Aroma
Descriptors associated with this fruit. Each names a character with a known cause, and association is not a promise — what reaches the glass depends on the ferment as much as on the apple.
- Apple skin — The dry, faintly waxy and slightly bitter aroma of the fruit’s surface rather than its flesh, carried by cuticular waxes, hexyl esters and skin-concentrated phenolics.
Measured analysis
Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.
Measured on the fruit
Measured on the fruit itself, before anything was done to it. These figures hold whatever was later made from the juice.
| Property | Reading | Where | When | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit diameter | 59 mm (55–63) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Fruit firmness | 67.9 N (59.1–76.7) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Fruit weight | 108 g (88–128) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Starch pattern index | 7.0 SPI (6.0–8.0) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
Measured on the juice
Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.
| Property | Reading | Where | When | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brix2 readings, spanning 11.9–14.8 °Bx | 11.9 °Bx (10.5–13.3) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| 14.8 °Bx | Winchester, Virginia, USA | 2012–2013Modern analysis | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | |
| pH2 readings, spanning 3.47–4.56 pH | 4.56 pH (4.49–4.63) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| 3.47 pH | Winchester, Virginia, USA | 2012–2013Modern analysis | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | |
| Titratable acidity2 readings, spanning 1.9–12.1 g/L | 1.9 g/L | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| 12.1 g/L | Winchester, Virginia, USA | 2012–2013Modern analysis | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | |
| Total phenolics2 readings, spanning 415.0–1810.0 mg/L | 1810.0 mg/L (1620.0–2000.0) | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| 415.0 mg/L | Winchester, Virginia, USA | 2012–2013Modern analysis | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | |
| Fructose | 73.1 g/L (55.1–91.1)Not used in comparisons: see note below | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Glucose | 23.5 g/L (15.7–31.3)Not used in comparisons: see note below | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Sorbitol | 19.9 g/L (13.7–26.1)Not used in comparisons: see note below | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
| Sucrose | 38.1 g/L (34.4–41.8)Not used in comparisons: see note below | USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA | 2017Modern analysis | Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit |
4 properties here have been measured more than once. The readings are shown as they were taken and are deliberately not averaged — climate, season, ripeness at picking, the age of the tree and the analytical method all move these numbers, and a single figure would hide every one of them. Where a spread is given below a property, it is the distance between separate studies, not the variation within any one of them.
How these were measured
- Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range. Published to two decimal places and shown at the precision CiderHQ displays for the unit.
- Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range.
- Cornell generic starch–iodine chart, 1–8, where 1 is no hydrolysis and 8 is complete. Mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of it.
- Penetrometer, mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- Refractometer on pressed juice. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- Titration to pH 8.1 with sodium hydroxide, reported as malic acid equivalents. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- The starting pH recorded by the autotitrator before titration, on juice stored frozen at −80 °C and thawed; the source describes no separate pH measurement. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- Folin–Ciocalteu assay against gallic acid standards, published in grams per litre of gallic acid equivalent and stored here as milligrams per litre by exact conversion. The source converts these figures to Löwenthal tannic acid equivalents, by a laboratory factor of 1.6, only to sort its accessions into classes; the figure here is the unconverted one.
- Enzymatic assay (Megazyme). Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- D-sorbitol/xylitol assay kit (Megazyme), sorbitol dehydrogenase method. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
- Refractometer on pressed juice.
- Meter on pressed juice.
- Titration, reported as malic acid. Published to two decimal places and shown at the one the site displays.
- Folin–Ciocalteu, reported as gallic acid equivalents.
- Glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol: Not used in any distribution, ranking or comparison. This programme’s enzyme-assayed sugars do not reconcile with its own refractometer readings across the collection — for many varieties the sugars add up to more than the Brix reading allows. The figures were checked against the thesis’s own tables in October 2026 and are transcribed exactly: the disagreement is in the published source, which does not say which reading is wrong. Proportions between glucose, fructose and sucrose, which came from one assay, are still used in summary.
- A chart position, not a quantity. Almost every accession here scored at or near 8, which says the fruit was picked at or past full starch conversion rather than that the cultivars are alike.
- One harvest at one site. Soluble solids move several degrees between seasons and with crop load.
- A Folin–Ciocalteu figure counts everything that reduces the reagent, not tannin alone, and is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate figure for the same juice. Compare this reading with other Folin–Ciocalteu readings in gallic acid equivalents.
- A Folin–Ciocalteu figure in gallic acid equivalents. It is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate “tannin” figure: the two assays respond to different things and can differ by a factor of two on the same juice.
Where it sits among the varieties each programme measured
| Programme | Property | Black Twig | Programme median | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Virginia polyphenol characterisation | Titratable acidity as malic | 12.1 g/L | 7.9 g/L | Above 16 and below 0 of the other 16: highest quarter |
| The Virginia polyphenol characterisation | pH | 3.47 | 3.64 | Above 0 and below 16 of the other 16: lowest quarter |
| The Virginia polyphenol characterisation | Total phenolics | 415 mg/L | 288 mg/L | Above 15 and below 1 of the other 16: highest quarter |
| The Virginia polyphenol characterisation | Brix | 14.8 °Bx | 13.1 °Bx | Above 14 and below 2 of the other 16: highest quarter |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Titratable acidity as malic | 1.9 g/L | 4.1 g/L | Above 9 and below 37 of the other 46: lowest quarter |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | pH | 4.56 | 3.64 | Above 36 and below 4 of the other 40: highest quarter |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Total phenolics | 1810 mg/L | 980 mg/L | Above 36, level with 1, below 9 of the other 46: highest quarter |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Brix | 11.9 °Bx | 12.5 °Bx | Above 17, level with 2, below 27 of the other 46: lower middle |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Fruit diameter | 59.0 mm | 65.0 mm | Above 9, level with 2, below 35 of the other 46: lowest quarter |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Fruit weight | 108 g | 124 g | Above 15, level with 1, below 30 of the other 46: lower middle |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Fruit firmness | 67.9 N | 58.9 N | Above 29 and below 15 of the other 44: upper middle |
| The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisation | Starch pattern index | 7.0 SPI | 8.0 SPI | Above 2, level with 2, below 40 of the other 44: lowest quarter |
Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.
Watched in the orchard
What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.
USDA-PGRU Malus germplasm characterisation
USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, in the Finger Lakes region of western New York State · 2017 · Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Humid continental, with cold winters and warm summers moderated by the Finger Lakes — a sharper seasonal swing than any of the European cider regions whose fruit the collection holds, and warm enough in late summer to bring acid down faster than a maritime autumn does.
- Held as
- PI 588952, held as “Arkansas”
The collection holds this accession as “Arkansas”, and holds a separate accession as “Arkansas Black” (PI 589117), measured here as well. CiderHQ files the first against Black Twig because Arkansas is a long-documented name for that fruit, and states the reasoning rather than hiding the join: the two are different trees under different labels, and the figures below belong to the tree labelled Arkansas.
One harvest season. Fruit assessed for weight, diameter, starch pattern index on the Cornell 1–8 chart and flesh firmness by penetrometer; juice pressed and measured for soluble solids by refractometer, titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.1 as malic acid, pH as the autotitrator’s starting reading on juice that had been frozen, total phenolics by Folin–Ciocalteu assay as gallic acid equivalent, and glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol by enzymatic assay.
Virginia cultivar polyphenol characterisation
Winchester, in the northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia · 2012–2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Humid subtropical shading into continental, with hot summers — warm enough that acid falls faster through the ripening period than it does in a maritime autumn, which is part of why the titratable acidities here run lower than English figures for comparable fruit.
- Held as
- Listed as “Black Twig”
Soluble solids by refractometer, pH by meter, titratable acidity by titration as malic acid, total polyphenols by Folin–Ciocalteu as gallic acid equivalents. Twenty cultivars, one site.
In the orchard
- Harvest window
- Very late
- Flowering
- Not recorded
- Vigour
- Vigorous
- Cropping
- Slightly biennial
- Keeping
- Very good — holds in store for weeks
Among the last picked in the southern uplands, and it needs months in store before it is worth eating; for pressing it is usually held several weeks at least.
Disease and pest susceptibility
| Issue | Susceptibility | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Fire blight | low | Reported as tolerant, consistent with its long persistence in the humid upper South. |
| Cedar apple rust | moderate | — |
Juice and pressing
- Genuine astringency — one of the few North American cultivars that supplies it without recourse to a crab.
- Moderate to firm acid.
- Good sugar and a dense, slow-running juice.
How it is used
- A winter keeper and market apple across the southern Appalachians.
- Pressed for southern farm cider, and used by modern makers specifically for tannin.
On its own
Sometimes bottled on its own
It has enough acid and enough tannin to stand up on its own, and some southern producers bottle it that way. The result is firm and dry rather than expressive.
About Black Twig
The southern Appalachians kept a working apple culture longer than most of the United States, partly because the terrain resisted consolidation and partly because the fruit was needed. Black Twig belongs to that culture: a hard, dark, extremely late apple that was picked in November, stored until spring, and pressed when there was surplus. It is one of the small number of American cultivars whose juice a modern blender values specifically for astringency.
How much astringency is a fair question, and this record answers it honestly by not giving a number. There is no analysis of Black Twig juice in CiderHQ’s register, and the tannin band above rests on the consistent testimony of people who press it rather than on a measurement. It is certainly more tannic than a McIntosh and certainly less tannic than a Dabinett; where in that range it sits is not something this file can state.
Its identity is also unsettled. Black Twig, Paragon and Mammoth Blacktwig may be one fruit, two or three, and Black Twig was marketed in the South under the bare name Arkansas, which collides with Arkansas Black. This is the ordinary condition of southern American pomology: a hundred and fifty years of local propagation without a central register, and a modern revival trying to work out what it has actually planted.
Names, origin and identity
Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.
Origin · traditional account
The origin is genuinely contested. A Tennessee raising is the more common attribution, an Arkansas one is defended, and the Paragon synonymy question sits on top of both. This record states the dispute rather than choosing a side.
| Name | Kind | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | Regional name | Arkansas and the Ozarks. Black Twig was marketed as Arkansas in parts of the South, which is a recurring source of confusion with Arkansas Black. |
| Paragon | Disputed identity | Paragon and Black Twig are treated as the same fruit by some authorities and as distinct by others; the question is not settled and CiderHQ does not resolve it here. |
| Mammoth Blacktwig | Trade name | the upper South. |
Why it matters
- One of the very small number of American cultivars that a blender reaches for when tannin is wanted and no European fruit is available.
Related cultivars
Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.
Fruit that plays a similar part
Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.
Dabinett
The most widely planted English cider apple: a small, late-ripening bittersweet whose soft, full tannin ferments into a cider that needs almost nothing added to it.
Harry Masters’ Jersey
A medium bittersweet from the Yarlington district, valued for tannin that is full without being harsh, and among the more reliable croppers in a class that is generally unreliable.
Argile Rouge
A late, dark-skinned Norman bittersweet whose name refers to the heavy red clay soils it was selected on, and which behaves very differently on lighter ground.
Arkansas Black
A very dark, very hard Ozark apple from the 1870s that keeps for half a year and softens slowly into a dense, moderately tannic juice.
Amariega
An Asturian cider apple admitted to the protected designation and characterised as bitter — 2,1 g/L of acid well below the register’s median, with 2,4 g/L of polyphenols, ripening in the last ten days of October.
Bedan
A mild Norman bittersweet, planted more widely across the Domfrontais and the Pays d’Auge than almost any other traditional cultivar, and valued as much for how its juice keeves as for how it tastes.
Where it grows
What people ask next
Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.
- How do you blend cider
- Is winesap good for cider — It is a traditional American cider and dessert apple, measured in Virginia at 13.2 degrees Brix, pH 3.69, 7.9 g/L titratable acidity and 373 mg/L polyphenols — moderately sharp, with more phenolic material than most dessert fruit and much less than a bittersweet.
- How long can apples be kept before pressing
- Why does cider smell of apple skin
- What is american heritage cider
- What is tannin balancing
Where to go next
- How cider apples are classified — Why there are four schemes and none of them is universal.
- The blend explorer — See which way changing the proportions moves a blend.
- Blending — What a cider maker is actually deciding when they build a blend.
Sources
What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.
Cider, Hard and Sweet: History, Traditions, and Making Your Own
Ben Watson, The Countryman Press, first edition 1999; third edition 2013 · reference work · bibliographic record verified, not opened 2026-08-25
Bibliographic record verified on 2026-08-25 against Open Library: first published 1999 by The Countryman Press, with five editions recorded and a 2008 printing scanned by the Internet Archive as ciderhardsweethi0000benw. The scan is access-restricted to the print-disabled collection. The site had registered this without a year; it now carries one, and the first-edition date matters because a general trade book on cider written in 1999 predates almost the whole of the North American cider revival it is sometimes cited about.
GRIN-Global germplasm database — Malus and Pyrus
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service · research institute · retrieved 2026-08-24
Cider: Making, Using and Enjoying Sweet and Hard Cider
Annie Proulx and Lew Nichols, Storey Communications, 1997; first published as Sweet & Hard Cider by Garden Way, 1980 · reference work · bibliographic record verified, not opened 2026-08-25
Bibliographic record verified on 2026-08-25 against Open Library, and the verification changed what CiderHQ knows about it. The work first appeared in 1980 as Sweet & Hard Cider: Making It, Using It, & Enjoying It (Garden Way, Charlotte, Vermont) and was retitled for the 1997 Storey edition the site had registered; nine editions are recorded in total. That matters for a source cited on North American practice, because a passage in the 1980 text and a passage in the 1997 one are not interchangeable and neither is the 2003 revision. Two scans exist in the Internet Archive — sweethardciderma0000prou for the 1980 edition and cidermakingusing0000prou for the 1997 — both access-restricted to the lending library and the print-disabled collection, so neither is openable by retrieval.
Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.