Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Moulin à Vent

A Norman bittersweet named for a windmill, brought to England with the 1880s imports and grown there long enough to acquire an English reputation of its own.

Also written Moulin a Vent, Moulin-à-Vent.

Classification
Bittersweet — French cider apple families
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Bittersweet base, Tannin and structure
Origin
Normandy
Species
Malus domestica
Flowering
Pollination group 4
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Moderate

How it is classified

Classified under more than one system. The systems use different thresholds and were built for different fruit, so the answers can legitimately differ — that is a fact about the schemes, not a contradiction.

French cider apple families

Bittersweet · Douce-amère

Low acid with substantial tannin.

Basis: Tannin 2 to 3 g/L and acidity below 3 g/L as H₂SO₄.

Long Ashton classification

Bittersweet

Low acid, high tannin. The class that has no real equivalent in dessert fruit and that defines West Country cider.

Basis: Below about 0.45% w/v acid and above about 0.2% w/v tannin.

Assessed in English-grown fruit analysed at Long Ashton..

Recorded as a bittersweet in England; the French family placement is the same in substance, and the schemes agree on this fruit as they do on Michelin.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninFirm
SugarModerate
BitternessModerate
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyFull
Based on: its recorded classification

Dual French and Long Ashton bittersweet placement.

Firmly bitter with a dry finish and low acid; harder-edged than Michelin and softer than the Fréquins.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Moulin à Vent, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Moulin à Vent into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Moulin à Vent. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Pollination group 4
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Moderate

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Cankermoderate
Scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Occasionally attempted in England; the low acid limits how far it gets alone.

About Moulin à Vent

Moulin à Vent is part of the same story as Bramtot: a Norman bittersweet that crossed to England during the deliberate importation of French cider fruit in the 1880s, was analysed at Long Ashton, and was planted in English orchards for several decades before the economics of intensive growing narrowed the field.

Its juice is a straightforward bittersweet with a firmer, drier grip than Michelin and less concentration than the Fréquins. In a French blend it is a structural component; in the English orchards where it was planted it was treated as a base fruit, fermented dry, and expected to carry a cider — which is a different job from the one it was selected for, and one it does adequately rather than well.

That difference is the general point about the imports. English growers took French cultivars and used them in the English way: no keeving, full attenuation, blends built to be dry. Fruit selected under an assumption of arrested, low-nitrogen fermentation does not automatically excel under those conditions, and the mixed English verdict on the 1880s imports is partly a verdict on a method mismatch rather than on the fruit.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Named for a landmark, which locates the tree without dating it.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.