Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Equipment

Choosing a fermentation vessel: material and shape

What vessel should I ferment cider in, and does the shape matter?

In short

The material question comes down to three properties: how much oxygen crosses the wall, whether the vessel adds or absorbs flavour, and whether the surface can genuinely be cleaned and sanitised.

The shape question is less discussed and matters more than people expect. Surface-to-volume ratio governs how fast a ferment tracks room temperature; depth governs how compact the lees are and how much hydrostatic pressure the yeast works under; and the area of the liquid surface governs how quickly a surface film can establish.

For most makers the honest answer is that any inert, cleanable, sealable vessel of roughly the right size will make good cider, and that vessel choice matters far less than keeping it full and clean.

Materials compared

Two rows in that table deserve emphasis. Plastic is the vessel most small makers actually use and is entirely legitimate, provided it is genuinely food-grade and retired when it is scratched. Wood is the vessel most romanticised and is the hardest to keep sound; a maker who is not prepared to keep a cask full, cool and monitored will get vinegar rather than character.

Fermentation vessel materials against the properties that matter
MaterialOxygen ingressFlavour contributionCleanabilityRelative cost per litreBest suited to
GlassEffectively noneNoneExcellent, but access is poorHigh at small volume, impractical above about 25 LSmall batches and long maturation
Stainless steelNone through the wall; only at fittingsNoneExcellent, and can be cleaned in placeHigh capital, very long lifeAnything from a few tens of litres upwards
Food-grade HDPE or polypropyleneLow but not zero; scales with time and thinnessNone when new; absorbs and re-releases taint over timeGood when new, poor once scratchedLowPrimary fermentation and short holding
Oak or chestnut caskLow, mostly at head and bung; high per litre in small casksOak character, and any previous fillPoor — porous, cannot be sanitisedModerate second-hand, high newMaturation where wood character is wanted
Large wooden vat or tunLow per litreSlight in an old vat; carries resident microfloraPoorEffectively a fixtureTraditional wild-fermented production
Lined concreteVery low through an intact liningNoneGood if the lining is sound, very poor if notLow material cost, immovableLarge-volume fermentation with thermal stability

What shape does to a ferment

Surface-to-volume ratio governs heat exchange. A demijohn in a kitchen is essentially at room temperature, because it loses heat as fast as the ferment makes it. A cubic metre of fermenting juice is not: it generates heat faster than it can shed it and will run several degrees above ambient, sometimes far more. This is why temperature control is optional at five litres and essential at five thousand, and why the same yeast and the same juice give different results at different scales.

Depth governs the lees. A tall, narrow vessel produces a deep, compact lees bed with a small footprint; a wide, shallow one produces a thin lees spread over a large area. Deep beds compact and can become anaerobic and reductive, which is one route to sulphide character; thin beds are easier to rack off cleanly but expose more cider to whatever is happening at the surface.

At large scale, depth also imposes hydrostatic pressure. Carbon dioxide is more soluble under pressure, so the bottom of a tall tank holds more dissolved gas than the top, and dissolved carbon dioxide inhibits yeast. Very tall vessels can therefore ferment more slowly at the base, and commercial practice sometimes limits tank height for this reason rather than for any structural one.

The liquid surface area is the third variable. Film yeasts and acetic bacteria colonise a surface, and a wide surface gives them more to work with and more oxygen contact per litre. A narrow-necked vessel is not just easier to seal; it presents a smaller target.

Matching vessel to stage

Many experienced makers do not use one vessel throughout. Primary fermentation, which is vigorous, messy, self-protecting and short, suits a cheap wide-mouthed vessel that can be cleaned easily. Maturation, which is long, quiet and vulnerable, suits an inert impermeable vessel that can be filled to the top.

That approach also solves the volume problem. Racking loses volume, so the vessel that was correctly sized for the ferment is oversized for what comes out of it. Having a smaller vessel ready for the racked cider is a more reliable answer than topping up, and much more reliable than hoping the headspace does not matter.

The last consideration is one nobody enjoys: whether the vessel can be lifted, moved, emptied and washed by the people who will actually have to do it. A vessel that is too heavy to handle will be cleaned badly, and cleaned badly is the origin of most of the faults in this section.

Also answered on this page

Questions this page covers, so you can tell at a glance whether it is the one you want.

Related

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Where to go next