Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Betty Prosser

A Monmouthshire perry pear named after a woman about whom nothing else is recorded, and one of the Welsh cultivars recovered by survey work.

Also written Betty Prossor.

Classification
Medium sharp — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Sometimes bottled on its own
Blend role
Acid lift, Tannin and structure
Origin
Monmouthshire
Species
Pyrus communis
Flowering
Mid flowering band
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Medium sharp

Moderate acid with low to moderate tannin.

Moderate acid with light to moderate tannin, from Welsh Perry and Cider Society cultivar work rather than from published analysis.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidHigh
TanninModerate
SugarModerate
BitternessSlight
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: its recorded classification

Welsh cultivar survey material rather than analysis. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.

A moderately sharp juice with a light drying edge, making a perry with more definition than the soft Monmouthshire pears.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Betty Prosser, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Betty Prosser into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Reported analyses of Betty Prosser, by property and source
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Free amino nitrogen49.2 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Phenolic acids380.0 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Proline269.9 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Specific gravity1.066 SGGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Total amino acids265.2 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Total phenolics1080.0 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
Total tannin700.0 mg/LGloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties, England2022Modern analysisCider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)
How these were measured
  • Juice pressed from fruit collected in the Three Counties and frozen before analysis. Published to five decimal places and shown at the three the site displays.
  • “True tannin” — the polymerised phenolic fraction, measured separately from the phenolic acids. Published in grams per litre and stored here in milligrams per litre by exact conversion.
  • Phenolic acids measured separately from the tannin fraction. Published in grams per litre and stored here in milligrams per litre by exact conversion.
  • The sum of the true tannin and phenolic acid fractions as the surveyor reports it. Published in grams per litre and stored here in milligrams per litre by exact conversion.
  • HPLC. The whole amino acid pool by mass, assimilable and non-assimilable together.
  • Free amino nitrogen, calculated from the individual amino acids as nitrogen available to yeast. Excludes proline.
  • HPLC.
  • One sample from one source in one season. The surveyor reports the same variety differing markedly between years, sites and tree types, and publishes the samples separately rather than pooling them.
  • Measured as “true tannin” — the polymerised phenolic fraction — separately from the phenolic acids. It is not a Folin–Ciocalteu total and not a permanganate total, and should be compared only with figures produced the same way.
  • Perry pear juice runs far lower in assimilable nitrogen than cider apple juice, a difference the Long Ashton workers reported and this survey confirms across most of the varieties sampled. Several readings here sit below the level at which a ferment is generally expected to need feeding.
  • Proline is an amino acid a wine or cider yeast cannot assimilate without oxygen, so it does not count towards usable nitrogen. In these pear juices it routinely exceeds the whole assimilable amino pool, which is why a perry must can be rich in amino acids and starved of nitrogen at the same time.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Three Counties perry pear juice survey

Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and neighbouring counties — the perry country itself, rather than a research station elsewhere · 2022–2024 · Cider and Perry Academy (Peter Mitchell)

The lower Severn and Wye vales: mild, wet, and the only ground in Britain where perry pears have ever been grown at scale. Fruit was collected across three autumns, and the survey reports each collection separately rather than pooling the seasons.

Held as
Sample BP-Oct22

Juice from single varieties, frozen before analysis. Specific gravity; titratable acidity by titration as malic acid; “true tannin” and phenolic acids measured as separate fractions; individual amino acids by HPLC, with free amino nitrogen calculated from them and proline reported apart because yeast cannot assimilate it anaerobically. Where samples differed by location, tree age or year, they are reported separately.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Mid flowering band
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Late September into October, with the usual narrow window. The National Perry Pear Collection records it ripening in the middle or later part of September at Hartpury, one band earlier than the mid window recorded here.

Mid-season. Self-incompatible. The National Perry Pear Collection places it in the mid flowering band, from flowering records kept over many seasons.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Ripening moves with the site and the season. Where the National Perry Pear Collection’s observation at Hartpury falls in a different band from the window recorded here, both are kept rather than one overwriting the other.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Sometimes bottled on its own

Made alone by Welsh makers in small quantities, which is as much as the surviving tree numbers allow.

About Betty Prosser

Betty Prosser is a Monmouthshire perry pear named after a person nobody can now identify. Prosser is a common surname on both sides of that stretch of border, and the naming presumably records whoever grew the original tree or on whose land it was found. The information the name carried has been lost while the name itself survived, which is the normal outcome for this fruit.

The juice is moderately sharp with a light drying edge — a medium-sharp pear giving a perry with more definition than the soft, sweet Monmouthshire cultivars it grows alongside. That makes it useful both as a blending component and, in small quantities, on its own.

It is one of the Welsh cultivars that came back through survey work. The Welsh Perry and Cider Society spent years locating perry pears in farm orchards and hedgerows in Monmouthshire and Gwent, recording what growers called them and propagating from trees that in several cases were down to single figures. Betty Prosser was one of those. The trees are still few, and a perry named for this cultivar is made in very small volumes.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Named for an individual whose identity is not documented. Prosser is a common Monmouthshire and Herefordshire surname, and the naming presumably commemorates whoever grew or found the tree.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.