Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Grüne Pichelbirne

The sharpest Austrian perry pear measured at Klosterneuburg, and one of the most phenolic — an Upper Austrian variety first recorded in 1822 whose must the trial found sharpest of eleven.

Also written Grüne Billingbirne, Grüne Pöllerbirne, Bichlbirne.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Established as a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Acid lift, Tannin and structure
Origin
Upper Austria
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Grüne Pichelbirne. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidVery high
TanninHeavy
SugarModerate
BitternessMarked
AstringencyHarsh
AromaPresent
BodyFull
Based on: published analysis

Klosterneuburg 2007–2008: 10.8 g/L acid as tartaric and 3.5 g/L residual sugar in the must, 2 830 mg/L total phenols in the fruit. Austrian perry pear composition is reported on a different acid convention from every other figure on this site: Austrian wine law expresses titratable acidity as tartaric acid, and the research follows it, where English, French and Spanish practice all report as malic. The same juice reads roughly a quarter lower as tartaric. CiderHQ stores what was published and names the basis rather than converting.

Sharp and, at harvest, heavily astringent — and the astringency is largely gone by the time the fruit is pressed.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Grüne Pichelbirne, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Grüne Pichelbirne into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Measured on the juice

Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.

Reported analyses of Grüne Pichelbirne, by property and source — measured on the juice
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Malic acid7.4 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Phenolic acids592.9 mg/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Titratable acidity10.8 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Total phenolics2830.0 mg/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246

Measured on the finished drink

Measured on the finished drink, after fermentation. Not comparable with the juice figures above: fermentation, fining and time move all of these, and phenolics in particular fall substantially.

Reported analyses of Grüne Pichelbirne, by property and source — measured on the finished drink
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Alcohol by volume7.2 % ABVVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Residual sugar3.5 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
How these were measured
  • Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy on single-variety must, one season. The fruit was stored before processing — the interval between the two dates on this record — and the storage is the point of the trial rather than an accident: the authors report that it broke tannin down to the level where very little fining was needed.
  • Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy on single-variety must, one season. The fruit was stored before processing — the interval between the two dates on this record — and the storage is the point of the trial rather than an accident: the authors report that it broke tannin down to the level where very little fining was needed. Titrated to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide and reported as TARTARIC acid, which is the Austrian wine-law convention and is not the malic convention every English and French figure on this site uses. The two are not interchangeable: the same juice reads about a quarter lower expressed as tartaric. CiderHQ stores the figure as the source reported it and states the basis rather than converting.
  • Folin-Ciocalteu after removal of sugars, acids and sulphur dioxide on a C18 cartridge. Not comparable with a Löwenthal permanganate figure, which is what the historic English tables report.
  • Chlorogenic acid by HPLC (ODS-Hypersil reversed phase, detection at 280 and 320 nm).
  • Ion chromatography on fruit from trees on Quince A rootstock.
  • A single-variety must made experimentally from trial-orchard fruit, not a commercial Most. What it shows is what the fruit can reach unaided in one Lower Austrian season.
  • Titrated to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide and reported as TARTARIC acid, which is the Austrian wine-law convention and is not the malic convention every English and French figure on this site uses. The two are not interchangeable: the same juice reads about a quarter lower expressed as tartaric. CiderHQ stores the figure as the source reported it and states the basis rather than converting.
  • Measured on the fruit at harvest in 2007. The same programme found that storing the fruit before pressing collapses this figure — in several varieties by more than an order of magnitude — so a harvest phenolic reading is not what reaches the must.
  • Chlorogenic acid alone rather than the whole phenolic acid fraction. It is the largest single phenolic compound in these juices and it browns readily without contributing much taste.
  • Fruit rather than must, and from the Quince A rootstock only; the same trial measured Pyrodwarf separately and the rootstock moved the figure.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Klosterneuburg Mostbirnen spindle trial

Versuchsgut Haschhof, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria · 2007–2008 · Wurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246

Pannonian-influenced continental, on the Danube north-west of Vienna: warmer and markedly drier than the Mostviertel proper, which is the perry pear country these cultivars come from. The trial orchard is a research planting rather than a working Mostviertel orchard, and the difference is worth holding in mind before a figure here is read as typical of the region.

Harvest
Picked 18.09.2008, pressed 23.10.2008 after storage
Held as
Listed as “Grüne Pichelbirne”

Fourteen Austrian perry pear cultivars planted spring 2002 at 4 × 2 m, trained as spindles on Quince A with an interstem and on Pyrodwarf, managed to organic rules; first cropping 2006. Dissolved solids by hand refractometer in °Oechsle; titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide, reported as tartaric acid; malic and citric acid by ion chromatography; total phenols by Folin–Ciocalteu after C18 clean-up; individual phenolics by HPLC; must alcohol, sugar and acid by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Picked in mid September at Klosterneuburg and pressed in late October, after around five weeks of storage. The gap is the process, not a delay.

Reported by the trial among the more fruitful varieties, with alternation unavoidable without crop-load management.

Not recorded. Austrian sources do not publish flowering groups or bands for Mostbirnen in any form CiderHQ has reached.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Established as a single-varietal cider

Made as a single-variety Most in the Mostviertel, where single-variety pear Most is the regional practice rather than the exception.

About Grüne Pichelbirne

Grüne Pichelbirne is the sharpest of the eleven Austrian perry pears whose must the Klosterneuburg trial analysed: 10.8 grams per litre of acid, against 4.0 for the mildest. It is also among the most phenolic, at 2 830 milligrams per litre of total phenols in the fruit — more than four times a dessert pear measured in the same trial.

What makes it interesting beyond the numbers is that the same trial measured its phenolics twice, at harvest and at pressing weeks later, and found 4 290 milligrams per litre falling to 110. That is a collapse of two orders of magnitude, and it is deliberate: the storage is there to break the tannin down. The Austrian ministry describes the same practice in prose — letting the fruit after-ripen before pressing raises the sugar and reduces the very high tannin and acid.

The English tradition calls a version of this sweating and the French answer the astringency problem by keeving instead. Austria does neither exactly; it stores hard fruit until the phenolics have gone, and the figures show how completely they go. A reader comparing a harvest phenolic reading for this pear with an English juice figure is comparing something that never reached a vat with something that did.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

The Austrian agriculture ministry reports it as first mentioned in 1822 by Georg Liegel and believed native to Upper Austria for three centuries before that. The 1822 date is a first mention rather than an origin.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.