Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Rote Pichelbirne

An Upper Austrian pear described in 1691, low in both acid and tannin, giving a must that does not keep — and consequently used for blending and for drying rather than alone.

Also written Rote Pöllerbirne, Rotbirne, Fraunpiern.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Early (September)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Bulk juice, Early season
Origin
Upper Austria
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Severely biennial — a substantial crop only every other year
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Rote Pichelbirne. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninModerate
SugarModerate
BitternessSlight
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: published analysis

Klosterneuburg 2007–2008: 7.7 g/L acid as tartaric, 2.4 g/L residual sugar, 1 750 mg/L total phenols. Austrian perry pear composition is reported on a different acid convention from every other figure on this site: Austrian wine law expresses titratable acidity as tartaric acid, and the research follows it, where English, French and Spanish practice all report as malic. The same juice reads roughly a quarter lower as tartaric. CiderHQ stores what was published and names the basis rather than converting.

Mild on both axes, with a juice that ferments readily and does not last.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Rote Pichelbirne, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Rote Pichelbirne into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Measured on the juice

Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.

Reported analyses of Rote Pichelbirne, by property and source — measured on the juice
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Malic acid5.9 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Phenolic acids96.2 mg/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Titratable acidity7.7 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Total phenolics1750.0 mg/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2007Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246

Measured on the finished drink

Measured on the finished drink, after fermentation. Not comparable with the juice figures above: fermentation, fining and time move all of these, and phenolics in particular fall substantially.

Reported analyses of Rote Pichelbirne, by property and source — measured on the finished drink
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Alcohol by volume6.8 % ABVVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
Residual sugar2.4 g/LVersuchsgut Haschhof, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria2008Modern analysisWurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246
How these were measured
  • Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy on single-variety must, one season. The fruit was stored before processing — the interval between the two dates on this record — and the storage is the point of the trial rather than an accident: the authors report that it broke tannin down to the level where very little fining was needed.
  • Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy on single-variety must, one season. The fruit was stored before processing — the interval between the two dates on this record — and the storage is the point of the trial rather than an accident: the authors report that it broke tannin down to the level where very little fining was needed. Titrated to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide and reported as TARTARIC acid, which is the Austrian wine-law convention and is not the malic convention every English and French figure on this site uses. The two are not interchangeable: the same juice reads about a quarter lower expressed as tartaric. CiderHQ stores the figure as the source reported it and states the basis rather than converting.
  • Folin-Ciocalteu after removal of sugars, acids and sulphur dioxide on a C18 cartridge. Not comparable with a Löwenthal permanganate figure, which is what the historic English tables report.
  • Chlorogenic acid by HPLC (ODS-Hypersil reversed phase, detection at 280 and 320 nm).
  • Ion chromatography on fruit from trees on Quince A rootstock.
  • A single-variety must made experimentally from trial-orchard fruit, not a commercial Most. What it shows is what the fruit can reach unaided in one Lower Austrian season.
  • Titrated to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide and reported as TARTARIC acid, which is the Austrian wine-law convention and is not the malic convention every English and French figure on this site uses. The two are not interchangeable: the same juice reads about a quarter lower expressed as tartaric. CiderHQ stores the figure as the source reported it and states the basis rather than converting.
  • Measured on the fruit at harvest in 2007. The same programme found that storing the fruit before pressing collapses this figure — in several varieties by more than an order of magnitude — so a harvest phenolic reading is not what reaches the must.
  • Chlorogenic acid alone rather than the whole phenolic acid fraction. It is the largest single phenolic compound in these juices and it browns readily without contributing much taste.
  • Fruit rather than must, and from the Quince A rootstock only; the same trial measured Pyrodwarf separately and the rootstock moved the figure.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Klosterneuburg Mostbirnen spindle trial

Versuchsgut Haschhof, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau, Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria · 2007–2008 · Wurm, Gössinger, Wendelin and Korntheuer, HBLA und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau Klosterneuburg, in Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 61 (2011): 236–246

Pannonian-influenced continental, on the Danube north-west of Vienna: warmer and markedly drier than the Mostviertel proper, which is the perry pear country these cultivars come from. The trial orchard is a research planting rather than a working Mostviertel orchard, and the difference is worth holding in mind before a figure here is read as typical of the region.

Harvest
Picked 03.09.2008, pressed 23.10.2008 after storage
Held as
Listed as “Rote Pichelbirne”

Fourteen Austrian perry pear cultivars planted spring 2002 at 4 × 2 m, trained as spindles on Quince A with an interstem and on Pyrodwarf, managed to organic rules; first cropping 2006. Dissolved solids by hand refractometer in °Oechsle; titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.1 with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide, reported as tartaric acid; malic and citric acid by ion chromatography; total phenols by Folin–Ciocalteu after C18 clean-up; individual phenolics by HPLC; must alcohol, sugar and acid by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Early
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Severely biennial — a substantial crop only every other year
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Picked on 3 September at Klosterneuburg, a fortnight ahead of every other variety in the trial, and pressed in late October.

Recorded by the trial among the least fruitful and most strongly alternate-bearing varieties.

Not recorded. Austrian sources do not publish flowering groups or bands for Mostbirnen in any form CiderHQ has reached.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

The Austrian ministry states that its low acid and tannin give a must that does not keep, which is a reason to blend it rather than bottle it.

About Rote Pichelbirne

Rote Pichelbirne is the mild counterpart to Grüne Pichelbirne, and the pair make the point that a shared name in Austrian pear nomenclature says as little as it does in English. The Klosterneuburg trial measured its must at 7.7 grams per litre of acid against Grüne Pichelbirne’s 10.8, and its fruit at 1 750 milligrams per litre of total phenols against 2 830.

The Austrian ministry states the practical consequence plainly: low acid and low tannin give a must that keeps badly, so the pear is blended with others rather than made alone. It is also one of the favoured drying pears of the Mostviertel, which is a use English perry pears essentially do not have.

It was picked earliest of any variety in the trial — the third of September, a fortnight before the rest — which is part of why it is a blending rather than a keeping pear.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

One of the earliest documented Austrian perry pears: the ministry records a 1691 description under the name Fraunpiern, and an 1824 one by the pomologist Schmidberger.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.