Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Perry pear

Puff

A small Three Counties perry pear with a name of uncertain meaning, surviving in very small numbers.

Also written Puff Pear.

Classification
Sweet — Perry pear classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Bulk juice
Origin
Gloucestershire or Herefordshire
Species
Pyrus communis
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

How it is classified

Perry pear classification

Sweet

Low acid, low tannin. Mild perry pears giving soft, light perry.

Low acid, low tannin, on descriptive material. The evidential basis for this cultivar is thin.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Thin descriptive material; wide bands are used deliberately.

A mild, low-acid juice; nothing in the surviving descriptions distinguishes it further.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Puff, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Puff into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Puff. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Poor — mill soon after picking

Autumn, in the main Three Counties window.

Presumed mid-season and self-incompatible.

Pears need a pollinator

Pears are not self-fertile. A variety needs another in blossom at the same time to set fruit, which is why the flowering band matters more in a perry orchard than the harvest window does.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Pear scabmoderate

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

No tradition and too few trees.

About Puff

Puff is a name without an explanation. Suggestions have been made — that it describes the shape of the fruit, or an effect of the perry — and none of them rests on evidence. The cultivar survives in very small numbers in Gloucestershire and is held in the national collection.

A reference file has to decide what to do with records like this one. The temptation is to fill the space, since a short entry looks like a failure of research. The alternative, taken here, is to record what exists — a name, a small population, a description of a mild low-acid juice — and to say plainly that the rest is not known. That is more useful to a reader than a paragraph of plausible invention, and it is the only treatment consistent with the way the well-documented cultivars in this file are handled.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Unrecorded, and the name is not explained by anything CiderHQ can verify. Suggestions that it describes the fruit’s shape or the perry’s effect are conjecture.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.