Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Democrat

A Tasmanian apple of the late nineteenth century, extremely hard and extremely long-keeping, grown for the export trade and now used by Tasmanian cider makers as a very late-season component.

Also written Democrat.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Very late (November onwards)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Late season, Acid lift
Origin
Tasmania
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Democrat. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidHigh
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessSlight
AstringencySlight
AromaRestrained
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Description of a hard, dense, very late-keeping Tasmanian apple. The bands are wide because the descriptive record is thin and no analysis exists in CiderHQ’s register.

Very hard and dense, sharp and unyielding at picking, softening slowly in store into a firm, moderately sharp juice.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Democrat, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Democrat into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Fruit weight116 g

New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, USA, late 1970s · Mean fruit weight as published. The compiler notes that a typical New York dessert apple weighs about 140 g, so most of these are small fruit — which is normal for cider cultivars and is itself the point of the column. · AVI / Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989, edited by Donald L. Downing (ISBN 0-442-22117-7)

Reaches CiderHQ through a transcription of a 1989 food-technology chapter, which itself printed unpublished 1980 work from the station. Unlike the chemistry in this dataset it is a measurement of the fruit rather than of the finished cider, so it is comparable with other fruit weights.

Mass of a single fruit. Measured in grams.

Total acid (finished cider)0.370 % w/v

New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, USA, late 1970s · Titration, reported as malic acid. Analysis of finished cider. · AVI / Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989, edited by Donald L. Downing (ISBN 0-442-22117-7)

Measured on finished cider after a spontaneous fermentation, not on juice. It is not comparable with a juice figure for the same cultivar, and the gap between the two is not a disagreement between laboratories — it is what fermentation did.

Acid measured after fermentation. Kept apart from the juice figure because malolactic conversion and yeast acid production both move it. Measured in percent weight per volume.

pH (finished cider)3.63 pH

New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, USA, late 1970s · Meter on finished cider. · AVI / Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989, edited by Donald L. Downing (ISBN 0-442-22117-7)

Measured on finished cider after a spontaneous fermentation, not on juice. It is not comparable with a juice figure for the same cultivar, and the gap between the two is not a disagreement between laboratories — it is what fermentation did.

Acid strength after fermentation, which is what governs microbial risk and sulphite behaviour in the vessel rather than in the press. Measured in ph.

Total tannin (finished cider)0.044 % w/v

New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, USA, late 1970s · Method not stated by the source, which is a real limitation: different tannin methods give wildly different figures on the same sample. · AVI / Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989, edited by Donald L. Downing (ISBN 0-442-22117-7)

Measured on finished cider after a spontaneous fermentation, not on juice. It is not comparable with a juice figure for the same cultivar, and the gap between the two is not a disagreement between laboratories — it is what fermentation did. The compiler notes these tannin figures run at roughly half the Long Ashton juice figures for the same cultivars, and cannot say how much of that is fermentation, how much is Geneva, and how much is method.

Phenolic load measured after fermentation, routinely well below the juice figure for the same fruit because fermentation, fining and time remove phenolic material. Measured in percent weight per volume.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

NYSAES Geneva cider cultivar analyses

New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York · late 1970s · AVI / Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989, edited by Donald L. Downing (ISBN 0-442-22117-7)

Humid continental, with a hotter summer and a colder winter than any European cider region. The compiler suggests the growing conditions may be part of why the phenolic figures sit so far below the English ones, and is careful not to claim it.

Held as
Listed as “Democrat”

Analysis of finished cider after a spontaneous fermentation. Acid by titration as malic; pH by meter; tannin by an unstated method; fruit weight as a mean. The data appear to come from a single season, and the original work was unpublished.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Very late
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

The last of the Tasmanian season, and traditionally held for months afterwards.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Bruising resistancelowIts extreme hardness made it a good shipping apple; the assessment is general cultivar description rather than any registered Australian trial.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Rarely bottled alone, and the evidence base is too thin to describe what such a cider would reliably be.

About Democrat

Democrat belongs to the same Tasmanian export economy as Sturmer Pippin and was selected on the same criteria: hard enough to survive a long sea voyage, sound enough to arrive saleable. It is a dense, unyielding apple that nobody would eat by choice at picking, and it improves substantially over a winter in store.

Modern Tasmanian cider makers use it to extend the pressing season. Fruit that can be held for months lets a small producer mill through the winter rather than compressing the whole year’s work into a few weeks, and Democrat and Sturmer between them do that for the Tasmanian industry.

The record is short because the evidence is. Australian cultivar documentation from the export era is markedly thinner than the American or English equivalents, CiderHQ holds no southern-hemisphere research source competent for juice analysis, and the descriptive record for Democrat is sparse. The wide bands in the blend profile above are an accurate representation of that uncertainty rather than a hedge.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Consistently reported as Tasmanian and as arising in the export-orchard era, but without a documented raiser or orchard. Australian cultivar records of this period are thinner than their North American equivalents.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Styles it is characteristic of

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Expert reference Evidence standard for this record. What that means.