Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Golden Noble

A Norfolk culinary apple of clean high acid, pressed in eastern counties cider for sharpness without the severity of Bramley.

Also written Golden Noble Apple.

Classification
Sharp — Long Ashton classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Acid lift
Origin
Norfolk
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Moderate
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

How it is classified

Long Ashton classification

Sharp

High acid, low tannin. Includes both purpose-grown sharps and many culinary apples.

Basis: Above about 0.45% w/v acid and below about 0.2% w/v tannin.

A sharp when pressed, with high acid and negligible tannin. Placed on description; no cider analysis attaches.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidHigh
TanninNegligible
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencyNone
AromaPresent
BodyLight
Based on: its recorded classification

Description of a culinary sharp. No cider analysis attaches to this cultivar. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.

Supplies clean acid with a little more sugar and roundness than Bramley gives at the same proportion.

Aroma

Descriptors associated with this fruit. Each names a character with a known cause, and association is not a promise — what reaches the glass depends on the ferment as much as on the apple.

Put Golden Noble into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Specific gravity1.046 SG

England — the source does not name the orchards, 1922–1977 · Published in the two-figure form the table uses (a printed 51 meaning 1.051) and written here in full. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three.

Juice density, the practical proxy for sugar before fermentation. Measured in specific gravity.

Total acid1.000 % w/v

England — the source does not name the orchards, 1922–1977 · Titration, reported as malic acid, on juice from freshly harvested fruit. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three. Several cultivars appear more than once in this table under sample numbers, and the repeats are far apart: Bramley’s acid is 1.21, 1.05 and 1.43 per cent in three rows. Read any single row as one pressing of one parcel of fruit.

How much acid the juice contains, conventionally reported as malic acid. Measured in percent weight per volume.

Total tannin0.050 % w/v

England — the source does not name the orchards, 1922–1977 · Method not stated in the compilation; the Long Ashton work behind it used Löwenthal permanganate titration. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three.

The phenolic fraction responsible for bitterness and astringency. Measured in percent weight per volume.

pH3.00 pH

England — the source does not name the orchards, 1922–1977 · Meter on juice from freshly harvested fruit. · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three.

Acid strength, which governs microbial risk and sulphite effectiveness. Measured in ph.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Typical English apple juice analyses

England — the compilation does not name the orchards · 1922–1977 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

English fruit-growing country, and no closer than that: the source gives neither site nor season for any individual row, which is a real limit on what the figures can be asked to do.

Held as
Listed as “Golden Noble”

Juice from freshly harvested fruit. Acidity and pH credited to MAFF/ADAS; the remainder to Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties (1977) and to the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. Specific gravity is printed in a two-figure form and written out in full here.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Moderate
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

October.

Mid to late flowering. No pollination group is recorded here.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

A culinary sharp; thin and severe fermented alone.

About Golden Noble

Golden Noble is a Norfolk cooker with a long reputation as one of the better English apples for a pie, and its cider use follows the same logic as Bramley’s: it is grown in quantity for another purpose and its surplus is sharp.

What distinguishes it from Bramley is a slightly gentler acid and a little more sugar, which means a blend can carry more of it before turning thin. It is a minority fruit in cider terms and mostly appears in eastern counties blends, where it is locally available.

It belongs here as part of a broader point: eastern England has a cider tradition built on culinary and dessert fruit rather than on bittersweets, because that is what the region grows. A cider from Norfolk or Essex is a different proposition from one from Somerset, and the difference starts in the orchard rather than in the cellar.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Found in a Norfolk orchard and introduced in the 1820s. The introduction is recorded; the raising is not.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.