Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Bramley’s Seedling

England’s dominant cooking apple, a triploid of very high acid and negligible tannin, and by volume one of the most important fruits in modern British cider.

Also written Bramley, Bramleys Seedling, Bramley Seedling.

Classification
Sharp — Long Ashton classification
Harvest
Late (Late October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Acid lift, Bulk juice
Origin
Southwell, Nottinghamshire
Species
Malus domestica
Flowering
Pollination group 3 · triploid
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks
Evidence
Analysed in 5 sources, watched at 4 trial sites

How it is classified

Long Ashton classification

Sharp

High acid, low tannin. Includes both purpose-grown sharps and many culinary apples.

Basis: Above about 0.45% w/v acid and below about 0.2% w/v tannin.

A sharp of very high acid and negligible tannin — one of the most extreme positions on the acid axis of any apple pressed for cider in Britain.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished drink will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidVery high
TanninNegligible
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencyNone
AromaPresent
BodyLight
Based on: published analysis

Long Ashton acid and tannin ranges, with acid at the top of the scale and tannin at the bottom.

Supplies acid and very little else, pulling a blend’s pH down sharply and leaving no tannin or body behind it.

Aroma

Descriptors associated with this fruit. Each names a character with a known cause, and association is not a promise — what reaches the glass depends on the ferment as much as on the apple.

Put Bramley’s Seedling into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Measured on the fruit

Measured on the fruit itself, before anything was done to it. These figures hold whatever was later made from the juice.

Reported analyses of Bramley’s Seedling, by property and source — measured on the fruit
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Fruit diameter2 readings, spanning 88–98 mm98 mmWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
88 mm (80–97)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit firmness56.2 N (36.4–76.0)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit weight294 g (221–366)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Juice yield558 L/tWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
Starch pattern index8.0 SPIUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Measured on the juice

Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.

Reported analyses of Bramley’s Seedling, by property and source — measured on the juice
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Total tannin6 readings, spanning 0.050–0.140 % w/v0.020–0.080 % w/vLong Ashton, Somerset, EnglandLong Ashton analyses, 1903–1985Historic analysisNational Fruit and Cider Institute / University of Bristol
0.090 % w/vWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
0.080 % w/vLong Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, Somerset, England1905–1975Historic analysisAndrew Lea
0.130 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
0.090 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
0.140 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
pH5 readings, spanning 2.95–3.12 pH3.12 pHWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
3.09 pH (2.94–3.24)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
3.08 pHEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
3.00 pHEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
2.95 pHEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
Total acid5 readings, spanning 0.850–1.430 % w/v0.800–1.050 % w/vLong Ashton, Somerset, EnglandLong Ashton analyses, 1903–1985Historic analysisNational Fruit and Cider Institute / University of Bristol
0.850 % w/vLong Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, Somerset, England1905–1975Historic analysisAndrew Lea
1.210 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
1.050 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
1.430 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
Specific gravity4 readings, spanning 1.040–1.051 SG1.045 SGWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
1.051 SGEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
1.040 SGEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
1.047 SGEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
Brix2 readings, spanning 8.9–11.2 °Bx11.2 °BxWSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Skagit Valley, Washington, USA2002–2017Modern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
8.9 °Bx (8.6–9.3)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fructose80.8 g/L (51.9–109.7)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Glucose17.8 g/L (14.6–21.0)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sorbitol6.1 g/L (2.3–9.9)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sucrose40.4 g/L (22.3–58.5)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Titratable acidity9.2 g/L (8.4–10.0)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Total phenolics850.0 mg/L (750.0–950.0)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

6 properties here have been measured more than once. The readings are shown as they were taken and are deliberately not averaged — climate, season, ripeness at picking, the age of the tree and the analytical method all move these numbers, and a single figure would hide every one of them. Where a spread is given below a property, it is the distance between separate studies, not the variation within any one of them.

How these were measured
  • Titration of pressed juice, reported as malic acid
  • Permanganate titration against indigo carmine, reported as tannic acid equivalent
  • Published as 3.86 inches; converted at 25.4 mm to the inch
  • Juice pressed from 25 fruit, 2015–2017 only. Published as 253 mL/lb; converted at 2.204623 lb to the kilogram
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range. Published to two decimal places and shown at the precision CiderHQ displays for the unit.
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range.
  • Cornell generic starch–iodine chart, 1–8, where 1 is no hydrolysis and 8 is complete. Mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of it.
  • Penetrometer, mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Refractometer on pressed juice. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Titration to pH 8.1 with sodium hydroxide, reported as malic acid equivalents. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • The starting pH recorded by the autotitrator before titration, on juice stored frozen at −80 °C and thawed; the source describes no separate pH measurement. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Folin–Ciocalteu assay against gallic acid standards, published in grams per litre of gallic acid equivalent and stored here as milligrams per litre by exact conversion. The source converts these figures to Löwenthal tannic acid equivalents, by a laboratory factor of 1.6, only to sort its accessions into classes; the figure here is the unconverted one.
  • Enzymatic assay (Megazyme). Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • D-sorbitol/xylitol assay kit (Megazyme), sorbitol dehydrogenase method. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Titration with alkali, reported as malic acid. Composite figure across many seasons; the source states neither the sample count nor the year of any individual analysis.
  • Löwenthal permanganate titration, reported as tannic acid equivalent. Composite figure across many seasons; the source states neither the sample count nor the year of any individual analysis.
  • Published in the two-figure form the table uses (a printed 51 meaning 1.051) and written here in full.
  • Titration, reported as malic acid, on juice from freshly harvested fruit.
  • Method not stated in the compilation; the Long Ashton work behind it used Löwenthal permanganate titration.
  • Meter on juice from freshly harvested fruit.
  • Glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol: Not used in any distribution, ranking or comparison. This programme’s enzyme-assayed sugars do not reconcile with its own refractometer readings across the collection — for many varieties the sugars add up to more than the Brix reading allows. The figures were checked against the thesis’s own tables in October 2026 and are transcribed exactly: the disagreement is in the published source, which does not say which reading is wrong. Proportions between glucose, fructose and sucrose, which came from one assay, are still used in summary.
  • A very high figure from fruit grown at one Somerset site. Bramley is a commercial crop grown across Britain on many rootstocks and regimes, and its acid varies substantially with region, season and time in store.
  • Effectively negligible, as expected of a culinary apple. Given as a range for consistency with the treatment of all Long Ashton figures here.
  • A chart position, not a quantity. Almost every accession here scored at or near 8, which says the fruit was picked at or past full starch conversion rather than that the cultivars are alike.
  • One harvest at one site. Soluble solids move several degrees between seasons and with crop load.
  • A Folin–Ciocalteu figure counts everything that reduces the reagent, not tannin alone, and is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate figure for the same juice. Compare this reading with other Folin–Ciocalteu readings in gallic acid equivalents.
  • A composite of Long Ashton analyses reaching CiderHQ through three hands: the station’s own work, a printed compilation (Bulmer’s Pomona, 1987, and Beech and Carr, 1977), and a transcription of that compilation. CiderHQ has seen only the transcription.
  • A composite of Long Ashton analyses reaching CiderHQ through three hands: the station’s own work, a printed compilation (Bulmer’s Pomona, 1987, and Beech and Carr, 1977), and a transcription of that compilation. CiderHQ has seen only the transcription. A permanganate figure. It is not comparable with a Folin–Ciocalteu total-phenolics figure for the same fruit, and the two can differ by a factor of two.
  • A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three.
  • A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three. Several cultivars appear more than once in this table under sample numbers, and the repeats are far apart: Bramley’s acid is 1.21, 1.05 and 1.43 per cent in three rows. Read any single row as one pressing of one parcel of fruit.

Where it sits among the varieties each programme measured

Bramley’s Seedling against every other variety the same programme measured the same way. Repeat samples are reduced to their median first, and where a programme published a range and not a single figure the midpoint of that range stands for it. Laboratories disagree on absolute figures more than on order, so the position is the sturdier reading.
ProgrammePropertyBramley’s SeedlingProgramme medianPosition
Typical English apple juice analysesTotal acid1.21 % w/v0.67 % w/vAbove 12 and below 0 of the other 12: highest quarter
Typical English apple juice analysesTotal tannin0.13 % w/v0.09 % w/vAbove 11 and below 1 of the other 12: highest quarter
Typical English apple juice analysesSpecific gravity1.0471.047Above 6 and below 6 of the other 12: upper middle
The Long Ashton cider apple tableTotal acid0.85 % w/v0.23 % w/vAbove 39 and below 3 of the other 42: highest quarter
The Long Ashton cider apple tableTotal tannin0.08 % w/v0.23 % w/vAbove 2 and below 40 of the other 42: lowest quarter
Long Ashton Research Station cider fruit analysesTotal acid0.93 % w/v0.20 % w/vAbove 34 and below 1 of the other 35: highest quarter
Long Ashton Research Station cider fruit analysesTotal tannin0.05 % w/v0.24 % w/vAbove 0 and below 34 of the other 34: lowest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationTitratable acidity as malic9.2 g/L4.1 g/LAbove 46 and below 0 of the other 46: highest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationpH3.093.64Above 0 and below 40 of the other 40: lowest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationTotal phenolics850 mg/L980 mg/LAbove 13, level with 1, below 32 of the other 46: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationBrix8.9 °Bx12.5 °BxAbove 2 and below 44 of the other 46: lowest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit diameter88.0 mm65.0 mmAbove 45 and below 1 of the other 46: highest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit weight294 g124 gAbove 46 and below 0 of the other 46: highest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit firmness56.2 N58.9 NAbove 17 and below 27 of the other 44: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationStarch pattern index8.0 SPI8.0 SPIAbove 20, level with 24, below 0 of the other 44: upper middle
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialpH3.123.92Above 0 and below 45 of the other 45: lowest quarter
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialTotal tannin0.09 % w/v0.20 % w/vAbove 5, level with 1, below 38 of the other 44: lowest quarter
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialSpecific gravity1.0451.051Above 3, level with 3, below 38 of the other 44: lowest quarter
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialBrix11.2 °Bx12.5 °BxAbove 3, level with 2, below 45 of the other 50: lowest quarter
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialJuice yield558.0 L/t545.0 L/tAbove 26, level with 2, below 14 of the other 42: upper middle
The WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trialFruit diameter98.0 mm63.0 mmAbove 43 and below 0 of the other 43: highest quarter

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

WSU Mount Vernon cider cultivar trial

Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center, Mount Vernon, Skagit Valley, Washington · 2002–2017 · Washington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center

Maritime, with cool summers and mild wet winters — the closest North American analogue to the English West Country, and the reason the programme planted European cider fruit here rather than east of the Cascades.

Mean full bloom
6 May
Harvest
24 September
Bloom density
3.1 of 5
Productivity
3.1 of 5
Growth habit
Spreading
Bearing
Standard
Alternate bearing
Semi alternate
Blind wood
2.5 of 5
Rootstocks
M26

Filed here as sharp, though the juice measured at this site falls in the sweet quadrant of the site’s own thresholds.

The class and the numbers disagree

WSU lists this fruit as sharp — the class it carries in England — but the juice measured at Mount Vernon falls in the sweet quadrant of the site’s own thresholds. Neither reading is an error. A class assigned on acid and tannin describes fruit grown somewhere, and this is somewhere else.

Published here, not republished by CiderHQ
  • total acid, published as 0.11% malic acid. Published alongside pH 3.12. The two cannot describe the same juice: a pH that low requires a heavy acid load, and Bramley’s Seedling is the archetypal high-acid English cultivar, normally around 1% malic. The figure reads as 1.11% with a digit lost.

Juice characteristics measured on 250 mL of pressed juice; juice yield from 25 fruit, 2015–2017 only. Bloom density, productivity and blind wood are the site’s own subjective 1–5 ratings. Figures are means across the seasons each cultivar was in the trial.

USDA-PGRU Malus germplasm characterisation

USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, in the Finger Lakes region of western New York State · 2017 · Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Humid continental, with cold winters and warm summers moderated by the Finger Lakes — a sharper seasonal swing than any of the European cider regions whose fruit the collection holds, and warm enough in late summer to bring acid down faster than a maritime autumn does.

Held as
PI 107171, held as “Bramley’s Seedling”

One harvest season. Fruit assessed for weight, diameter, starch pattern index on the Cornell 1–8 chart and flesh firmness by penetrometer; juice pressed and measured for soluble solids by refractometer, titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.1 as malic acid, pH as the autotitrator’s starting reading on juice that had been frozen, total phenolics by Folin–Ciocalteu assay as gallic acid equivalent, and glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol by enzymatic assay.

Long Ashton composite cider apple analyses

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England · 1905–1975 · Andrew Lea

Maritime and mild, with wet autumns and few hard frosts — the climate the English cider cultivars were selected in, and the reason their acid and tannin figures here are the ones the rest of the world has spent a century comparing its own fruit against.

Held as
Listed as “Bramley’s Seedling”, culinary season

Filed here as sharp.

Freshly expressed juice, not finished cider. Acid by straight titration against alkali, reported as malic acid; tannin by Löwenthal permanganate titration, reported as tannic acid equivalent. Composite figures across seventy years of analyses: the source gives neither a sample count nor the year of any individual reading.

Typical English apple juice analyses

England — the compilation does not name the orchards · 1922–1977 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

English fruit-growing country, and no closer than that: the source gives neither site nor season for any individual row, which is a real limit on what the figures can be asked to do.

Held as
Listed as “Bramley”, sample 1

Juice from freshly harvested fruit. Acidity and pH credited to MAFF/ADAS; the remainder to Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties (1977) and to the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. Specific gravity is printed in a two-figure form and written out in full here.

Typical English apple juice analyses

England — the compilation does not name the orchards · 1922–1977 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

English fruit-growing country, and no closer than that: the source gives neither site nor season for any individual row, which is a real limit on what the figures can be asked to do.

Held as
Listed as “Bramley 2”, sample 2

Juice from freshly harvested fruit. Acidity and pH credited to MAFF/ADAS; the remainder to Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties (1977) and to the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. Specific gravity is printed in a two-figure form and written out in full here.

Typical English apple juice analyses

England — the compilation does not name the orchards · 1922–1977 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

English fruit-growing country, and no closer than that: the source gives neither site nor season for any individual row, which is a real limit on what the figures can be asked to do.

Held as
Listed as “Bramley 3”, sample 3

Juice from freshly harvested fruit. Acidity and pH credited to MAFF/ADAS; the remainder to Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties (1977) and to the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. Specific gravity is printed in a two-figure form and written out in full here.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Late
Flowering
Pollination group 3 · triploid
Vigour
Very vigorous — a large tree that takes years to settle to cropping
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

Late October, and it stores for months in commercial cold storage — which is why cider mills can take it out of season.

Tends to biennial bearing, managed commercially by thinning and chemical regulation.

Exceptional keeping, which is central to its commercial role and to its availability to cidermakers year-round.

A triploid: its pollen is sterile, so it needs two other compatible cultivars nearby and cannot pollinate them in return. A widely known constraint in commercial orchards.

110 other cultivars on this site with a recorded group could pollinate it — diploids flowering in group 3 or a group either side. See which, with their class and harvest window.

Triploid

A triploid carries three sets of chromosomes rather than two, and its pollen is effectively sterile. It cannot pollinate another tree and needs two compatible pollinators of its own, which is a real constraint on how an orchard containing it has to be planted.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
ScabhighSusceptible, and managed intensively in commercial culinary orchards.
CankerhighNotably canker-prone, a significant issue in Bramley production.
Powdery mildewmoderate—

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

Fermented alone it gives something extremely sharp, thin and without structure. It is used as a correction, not as a cider.

About Bramley’s Seedling

Bramley is not a cider apple and it is one of the most important apples in British cider. The reason is arithmetic. A commercial blend built on bittersweet fruit is short of acid and sits at a pH high enough to be a microbiological liability, and Bramley — grown by the hundred thousand tonnes for cooking, with a reliable surplus of out-of-grade fruit — supplies acid more cheaply and more consistently than any purpose-grown sharp.

What it gives is narrow and very effective. Malic acid at the top of the British range, no tannin, modest sugar, no structural contribution at all. Ten per cent in a blend brightens it and drops the pH into a range where sulphite works properly. Thirty per cent makes something thin and hard. Producers who work with it treat it as a reagent rather than as an ingredient, and that is the right way to think about it.

Its origin is genuinely documented, which almost nothing else in this file can claim. Mary Ann Brailsford raised it from a pip at Southwell in Nottinghamshire around 1809; Matthew Bramley later owned the garden and gave the fruit his name when it was propagated commercially. There is a surviving original tree and contemporary record. Set against the hedgerow-seedling folklore attached to Dabinett or Kingston Black, the contrast is instructive: most cider apple origins are not documented because nobody thought at the time that they mattered.

The triploid habit is worth understanding for anyone planting it. Bramley produces sterile pollen, so it takes from the orchard without giving back and needs two other compatible cultivars to crop. That is a well-known constraint in culinary orchards and an easily overlooked one where a few trees are planted for cider.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · documented

Raised from a pip by Mary Ann Brailsford at Southwell around 1809, and later propagated by Matthew Bramley, whose name it carries. This is one of very few English apple origins supported by contemporary documentation and a surviving original tree rather than by recollection.

Parentage · not established

A chance seedling. No parentage recorded.

Other names this fruit is known by. Each is a name for the same cultivar, not a separate one — which is why none of them has a page of its own.
NameKindNote
BramleyTrade nameThe universal short form in trade and domestic use.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Styles it is characteristic of

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.