Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Hudson’s Golden Gem

A large Oregon russet found as a chance seedling in the 1930s, unusually sweet and nutty, and one of the few Pacific Northwest heritage apples with a genuine cider following.

Also written Hudson Golden Gem, Golden Gem.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Aroma, Sugar and body
Origin
Tangent, Oregon, in a fencerow at Hudson’s Wholesale Nurseries
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Moderate
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Hudson’s Golden Gem. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninLight
SugarHigh
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPronounced
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Description of a sweet, low-acid russet with pronounced nutty aroma. No juice analysis for this cultivar is held in CiderHQ’s register.

Sweet, nutty and pear-like, with notably little acid for a russet.

Aroma

Descriptors associated with this fruit. Each names a character with a known cause, and association is not a promise — what reaches the glass depends on the ferment as much as on the apple.

Put Hudson’s Golden Gem into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Hudson’s Golden Gem. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Moderate
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

Keeps less well than most russets and is generally pressed within a few weeks.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Apple scablowReported as unusually clean in the maritime Pacific Northwest, where scab pressure is high.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Too low in acid to stand alone safely or palatably. Its aroma makes it a valued small component rather than a base.

About Hudson’s Golden Gem

The Pacific Northwest has a shorter apple history than the eastern United States and a very different one. Irrigation and a dry summer made the interior valleys of Washington and Oregon into the largest apple-growing region in the world during the twentieth century, and almost everything planted there was chosen for the fresh market. Hudson’s Golden Gem is a rare regional heritage cultivar rather than a commercial one — a chance seedling found in a nursery fencerow in Oregon and propagated because someone tasted it.

It is sweet, nutty and low in acid, and that combination makes it a component rather than a base. Its aroma is genuinely distinctive and its acid is genuinely inadequate, so a maker uses a proportion of it for perfume and brings sharpness from elsewhere. It illustrates a general point about the region: Pacific Northwest cider is built far more on imported English and French cultivars than on local heritage fruit, because there was very little local heritage fruit to build on.

No analysis of its juice sits in CiderHQ’s register, which is the ordinary condition for a cultivar of this scale of planting. Where the research programmes have not looked, this file does not supply numbers.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · documented

A recent enough origin that the finding is documented rather than reconstructed, which is unusual among the cultivars in this file.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.