Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Sweet Sixteen

A 1978 Minnesota release with a distinctive aniseed and cherry-like aroma, hardy to the upper Midwest and Quebec, and used by northern cider makers as an aromatic component.

Also written Sweet 16.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Sometimes bottled on its own
Blend role
Aroma, Sugar and body
Origin
University of Minnesota fruit breeding programme, Excelsior, Minnesota
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Sweet Sixteen. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninNegligible
SugarHigh
BitternessNone
AstringencyNone
AromaDominant
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Description of a strongly and unusually aromatic hardy cultivar. No juice analysis is registered.

A pronounced aniseed or fennel note over a cherry-like fruitiness — genuinely unlike any other apple in this file.

Aroma

Descriptors associated with this fruit. Each names a character with a known cause, and association is not a promise — what reaches the glass depends on the ferment as much as on the apple.

Put Sweet Sixteen into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Sweet Sixteen. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Winter cold injurylow
Apple scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Sometimes bottled on its own

The aroma is strong enough to carry a cider, and divisive enough that not every drinker will want it to. There is no structure behind it.

About Sweet Sixteen

Sweet Sixteen is the aromatic outlier of the Minnesota programme. It carries a distinct aniseed or fennel note with a cherry-like fruitiness underneath, which is not something apples usually do, and the character comes through fermentation strongly enough to define a cider made with any quantity of it.

Northern makers use it in small proportion for that reason. The acid is only moderate and there is no tannin, so it cannot structure a blend; what it does is give a northern cider an identifiable aroma in a region where the alternative is McIntosh perfume or nothing.

It belongs with Chestnut Crab, Frostbite and Honeycrisp in the group of cold-hardy Minnesota material that the Quebec and northern New England cider trade has built on. That group exists because a land-grant university spent a century breeding fruit that would survive a continental winter, and the cider revival in those regions is a direct beneficiary of work done with no thought of cider at all.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Parentage · a recorded cross

Northern Spy crossed with the Minnesota selection later released as Frostbite. Recorded as a cross by the breeding programme that made it, which is strong evidence about what was intended and weaker evidence about which pollen took; no genotyping study CiderHQ has read confirms it.

The breeding programme recorded making this cross. Strong evidence about what was intended; weaker evidence about which pollen actually took, which only genotyping settles.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Parentage

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.