Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Frostbite

A small, extremely hardy Minnesota selection with an intense sugar-cane sweetness, held unreleased for seventy years and named in 2008, now grown by northern cider makers for concentration.

Also written Frostbite, MN 447.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Sometimes bottled on its own
Blend role
Sugar and body, Aroma
Origin
University of Minnesota fruit breeding programme, Excelsior, Minnesota
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Moderate
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Frostbite. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninLight
SugarVery high
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPronounced
BodyFull
Based on: description rather than analysis

Consistent description of an exceptionally sweet, distinctively flavoured hardy selection. No juice analysis is held in CiderHQ’s register.

A concentrated, almost molasses-like sweetness with a distinctive sugar-cane character quite unlike an ordinary apple.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Frostbite, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Frostbite into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Frostbite. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Moderate
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Moderate

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Winter cold injurylowExceptionally hardy — it was selected for survival in Minnesota winters, and that is the origin of the name.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Sometimes bottled on its own

Its flavour is distinctive enough to carry a small batch, though the low acid leaves the result soft and it is more often blended.

About Frostbite

Frostbite spent seventy years as a number. The Minnesota programme selected it in the 1930s for cold hardiness, used it repeatedly as a breeding parent, and did not release it — the fruit is small and the flavour is odd by dessert-apple standards. It was finally named in 2008, at which point growers discovered they had a fruit with a highly concentrated, almost molasses-like sweetness and enough hardiness for anywhere apples grow at all.

Northern cider makers took it up for the sugar. Its acid is modest, so it does not carry a blend on its own, but a proportion of Frostbite juice raises gravity substantially and brings a genuinely unusual flavour with it. In ice cider, where everything concentrates together, that combination is worth having.

It also has a genealogical importance out of proportion to its planting. Frostbite is behind Keepsake, and Keepsake is one of the parents of Honeycrisp — so the most commercially successful North American apple of the modern era descends from an unreleased hardiness selection that nobody thought worth naming for seventy years.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · documented

Held as an unreleased breeding parent for most of the twentieth century; it stands behind Keepsake and, through Keepsake, behind Honeycrisp.

Other names this fruit is known by. Each is a name for the same cultivar, not a separate one — which is why none of them has a page of its own.
NameKindNote
MN 447Trade nameThe Minnesota selection number under which it circulated for decades before it was named and released.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Parentage

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.