Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Fault

Mercaptan taint

Onion, garlic, burnt rubber and cooked-cabbage aromas from thiols and disulphides formed when hydrogen sulphide is left in cider long enough to react onwards.

Also called thiol taint, onion and rubber character.

Severity
Serious — the batch may not be salvageable
Where it starts
Fermentation, Maturation, Storage
Can it be fixed?
Yes, if caught in time
When you notice it
Fermentation, Maturation
Signs
5 recorded

What it is

Mercaptans, more properly thiols, are sulphur compounds that form from hydrogen sulphide during and after fermentation. Where hydrogen sulphide smells of rotten eggs and is volatile enough to blow off, mercaptans smell of onion, garlic, drains, burnt rubber and cooked cabbage, and they are stable. They are the reason the advice about hydrogen sulphide is always to deal with it immediately: this is what it becomes if it is left.

What you notice

Grouped by sense, because that is how the fault presents itself rather than how it works.

On the nose

  • A raw onion or crushed garlic smell in an otherwise clean cider
  • Burnt rubber or a struck tyre note
  • Boiled or rotting cabbage, particularly on a cider that has been in bottle some time
  • A stale, sewage-like note that does not disperse when the glass is swirledPersistence on swirling is the practical way to separate this from simple hydrogen sulphide, which lifts away.

How the batch behaves

  • A cider that seemed only faintly sulphurous in tank and is markedly worse months later in bottle

The words for it: Drains, Rubber, Garlic. Each links to what produces it.

When it appears. Weeks after the hydrogen sulphide that produced it, usually during maturation on lees. By the time it is recognisable, the reaction that formed it has already gone past the point where aeration helps.

What is known about detecting it

Detection thresholds for the thiols involved are extremely low, and the smell persists in the glass rather than blowing off — which is itself the practical test that separates it from a reductive character that will lift.

Andrew Lea

What it is mistaken for, and how to tell

One observation per rival, chosen because it separates them rather than because it describes either. Several of these are not faults at all — a style feature, a normal outcome, or the fruit behaving as it does.

What is actually happening

The chemistry or microbiology behind it. Understanding the mechanism is what makes the prevention make sense rather than being a list of rules.

Hydrogen sulphide left in cider reacts with ethanol and with other alcohols and carbonyl compounds to give simple thiols, chiefly ethanethiol and methanethiol. These have very low odour thresholds and are far less volatile than hydrogen sulphide, so they cannot be removed by the racking that would have dealt with the parent compound.

Thiols oxidise readily to disulphides — diethyl disulphide and dimethyl disulphide — which smell of cooked vegetables and rubber. The reaction is reversible: under the reducing conditions inside a sealed bottle, disulphides can be reduced back to the more strongly smelling thiols. This is why a cider can pass inspection at bottling and be unmistakably faulty a year later, and why the problem sometimes appears to come and go.

A third group, the sulphides proper, includes dimethyl sulphide, which arises from precursors such as S-methylmethionine carried in from the fruit rather than from the sulphate reduction pathway, and which smells of cooked sweetcorn or tinned vegetables. It behaves differently and is not removed by the same measures.

Yeast autolysis contributes. Cider held on a heavy yeast bed for months releases sulphur-containing amino acids and peptides as cells break down, providing further substrate for thiol formation in a low-oxygen environment.

How it happens

Causes, with the stage each originates at and how often it is the explanation.
CauseStageHow often
Hydrogen sulphide produced during fermentation and not dealt with at the timeFermentationcommon
A nitrogen-deficient ferment that ran under stress from the startFermentationcommon
Extended ageing on heavy lees without racking or stirringMaturationoccasional
Strongly reducing conditions in a sealed vessel or bottle over long storageStorageoccasional
Light exposure of bottled cider, which generates thiols by a separate routeThis is light-strike, and it produces similar-smelling compounds from riboflavin-mediated chemistry rather than from sulphate reduction.Storageoccasional

Can it be put right?

Most cider faults cannot be reversed. Where that is the answer it is given plainly — an honest 'this batch is what it is' is more useful than a procedure that will not work.

Corrective options and how well each actually works.
OptionEffectivenessWhat it involves
Accept the batch as lost and correct the nitrogen management next seasonReliableThe honest answer for most home producers. A cider with an established onion-and-rubber character is not going to be recovered in a domestic setting, and the value of the diagnosis lies entirely in the next harvest.
Copper finingUnlikely to workIt is the recognised commercial treatment and it is not a home procedure. Copper additions are legally limited, residual copper is itself a taint and a powerful oxidation catalyst, and disulphides are not removed by copper at all unless first reduced. CiderHQ publishes no dose; a producer considering it should be working from a supplier specification and a laboratory result.
Blend into a much larger clean volumeUnlikely to workThresholds are so low that the dilution needed usually spoils more cider than it saves.
Blow the compounds off by racking or splashingNot possibleThey are not volatile enough. This works for hydrogen sulphide and does not work here; the attempt simply oxidises the cider.
On dosages

CiderHQ gives no additive dosage figures. An addition is a food-safety decision that depends on legal limits, on the juice in front of you and on what you are protecting against, and the right figure comes from your supplier’s or regulator’s own guidance rather than from a general reference.

Preventing it

More on this

Mercaptan taint is most usefully understood as hydrogen sulphide that was allowed to grow up. Everything about the fault — its persistence, its resistance to treatment, its habit of appearing months after bottling — follows from the fact that the volatile parent compound has been converted into stable derivatives.

The reversible relationship between thiols and disulphides explains an otherwise baffling pattern. A cider assessed at bottling may show little; in the reducing environment of a sealed bottle the disulphides are progressively reduced to thiols, and the fault emerges. A cider poured and left in the glass may then improve slightly as oxygen pushes the equilibrium the other way. Neither observation means the compounds have gone.

It matters that this is not an infection and not a hygiene failure. No spoilage organism is involved. The cause is nutritional stress in an ordinary fermentation, which is why the corrective work belongs at the juice stage of the following season and not in the cleaning cupboard.

For a home producer the realistic position is that this fault should be prevented rather than treated. The commercial treatment exists, but it involves adding a metal to a drink under laboratory control, and improvising it is a genuinely bad idea.

The compounds involved

The organisms involved

Where in the process it arises

Faults it is confused with

These present similarly. What separates them is set out on each page.

Where this comes up in a guide

The link lands on the step where the fault arises rather than at the top of the pathway, because that is where the decision that causes it is taken.

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.