Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Saint Martin

A very late Norman bittersweet named for the feast of Saint Martin on 11 November, which is roughly when it is expected to be ready.

Also written Saint-Martin, Pomme de Saint Martin.

Classification
Bittersweet — French cider apple families
Harvest
Very late (November onwards)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Late season, Sugar and body, Bittersweet base
Origin
Normandy
Species
Malus domestica
Flowering
Pollination group 5
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

How it is classified

French cider apple families

Bittersweet · Douce-amère

Low acid with substantial tannin.

Basis: Tannin 2 to 3 g/L and acidity below 3 g/L as H₂SO₄.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninModerate
SugarHigh
BitternessModerate
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyFull
Based on: description rather than analysis

French bittersweet placement, with the caveat that the name is used loosely enough that a single classification may not describe every tree grown as Saint Martin.

Rich and soft with a mild bitterness, the sugar noticeably high because the fruit has hung so long.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Saint Martin, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Saint Martin into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Saint Martin. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Very late
Flowering
Pollination group 5
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

Around Martinmas, and often later. The extended hang is what builds the sugar.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Its high sugar would carry a single-varietal ferment, but the fruit is too scattered and too loosely identified for anyone to make a habit of it.

About Saint Martin

Saint Martin is a harvest date wearing the disguise of a cultivar name. Martinmas, 11 November, was one of the fixed points of the northern European agricultural year — the end of the harvest, the traditional day for slaughtering and salting, and in cider country the last realistic date for getting fruit off the tree. An apple named for it is being described by when it is ready, not by who raised it.

The practical value of such fruit was real. A very late apple accumulates sugar through weeks of cool autumn weather, arrives when the mill has finished with everything else, and stores until midwinter. In an orchard economy where a farm pressed its own fruit over a long season with one press, that sequencing mattered more than fine distinctions of tannin.

The identity is correspondingly loose. Trees grown as Saint Martin in different parts of Normandy are not certainly the same clone, and a classification statement about the name should be read as a statement about a type. CiderHQ records one entry because the alternative — a record per local tree — would be worse, but the uncertainty is genuine and is stated here rather than buried.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Saints’ days were the common way of fixing agricultural dates before printed calendars were general, and several unrelated fruits across Europe carry saints’ names for the same reason. This is a Norman one; it is not certain that every tree sold under the name is the same cultivar.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.