Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Tardive Forestier

A late Norman bittersweet named for its season and for the family that grew it, planted where a mill needed fruit after the main crop was through.

Also written Tardive Forestier de Normandie.

Classification
Bittersweet — French cider apple families
Harvest
Very late (November onwards)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Late season, Bittersweet base, Sugar and body
Origin
Normandy
Species
Malus domestica
Flowering
Pollination group 5
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Good
Evidence
Analysed in 1 source, watched at 1 trial site

How it is classified

French cider apple families

Bittersweet · Douce-amère

Low acid with substantial tannin.

Basis: Tannin 2 to 3 g/L and acidity below 3 g/L as H₂SO₄.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished drink will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidLow
TanninModerate
SugarHigh
BitternessModerate
AstringencyNoticeable
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: its recorded classification

French bittersweet family placement; the descriptive record for this cultivar is limited. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.

A moderate bittersweet with the extra sugar that a long hang gives, and a soft rather than gripping tannin.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Tardive Forestier, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Tardive Forestier into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Measured on the fruit

Measured on the fruit itself, before anything was done to it. These figures hold whatever was later made from the juice.

Reported analyses of Tardive Forestier, by property and source — measured on the fruit
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Fruit diameter65 mm (56–74)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit firmness58.7 N (50.0–67.4)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit weight122 g (75–170)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Starch pattern index7.9 SPI (7.7–8.2)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Measured on the juice

Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.

Reported analyses of Tardive Forestier, by property and source — measured on the juice
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Brix11.4 °Bx (10.3–12.5)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fructose74.3 g/L (69.7–78.9)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Glucose14.2 g/L (10.2–18.2)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
pH3.45 pH (3.43–3.47)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sorbitol10.1 g/L (8.6–11.6)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sucrose34.4 g/L (23.9–44.9)Not used in comparisons: see note belowUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Titratable acidity6.2 g/L (5.7–6.7)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Total phenolics840.0 mg/L (720.0–960.0)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
How these were measured
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range. Published to two decimal places and shown at the precision CiderHQ displays for the unit.
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range.
  • Cornell generic starch–iodine chart, 1–8, where 1 is no hydrolysis and 8 is complete. Mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of it.
  • Penetrometer, mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Refractometer on pressed juice. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Titration to pH 8.1 with sodium hydroxide, reported as malic acid equivalents. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • The starting pH recorded by the autotitrator before titration, on juice stored frozen at −80 °C and thawed; the source describes no separate pH measurement. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Folin–Ciocalteu assay against gallic acid standards, published in grams per litre of gallic acid equivalent and stored here as milligrams per litre by exact conversion. The source converts these figures to Löwenthal tannic acid equivalents, by a laboratory factor of 1.6, only to sort its accessions into classes; the figure here is the unconverted one.
  • Enzymatic assay (Megazyme). Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • D-sorbitol/xylitol assay kit (Megazyme), sorbitol dehydrogenase method. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol: Not used in any distribution, ranking or comparison. This programme’s enzyme-assayed sugars do not reconcile with its own refractometer readings across the collection — for many varieties the sugars add up to more than the Brix reading allows. The figures were checked against the thesis’s own tables in October 2026 and are transcribed exactly: the disagreement is in the published source, which does not say which reading is wrong. Proportions between glucose, fructose and sucrose, which came from one assay, are still used in summary.
  • A chart position, not a quantity. Almost every accession here scored at or near 8, which says the fruit was picked at or past full starch conversion rather than that the cultivars are alike.
  • One harvest at one site. Soluble solids move several degrees between seasons and with crop load.
  • A Folin–Ciocalteu figure counts everything that reduces the reagent, not tannin alone, and is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate figure for the same juice. Compare this reading with other Folin–Ciocalteu readings in gallic acid equivalents.

Where it sits among the varieties each programme measured

Tardive Forestier against every other variety the same programme measured the same way. Repeat samples are reduced to their median first, and where a programme published a range and not a single figure the midpoint of that range stands for it. Laboratories disagree on absolute figures more than on order, so the position is the sturdier reading.
ProgrammePropertyTardive ForestierProgramme medianPosition
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationTitratable acidity as malic6.2 g/L4.1 g/LAbove 40 and below 6 of the other 46: highest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationpH3.453.64Above 8 and below 32 of the other 40: lowest quarter
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationTotal phenolics840 mg/L980 mg/LAbove 12 and below 34 of the other 46: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationBrix11.4 °Bx12.5 °BxAbove 12, level with 1, below 33 of the other 46: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit diameter65.0 mm65.0 mmAbove 22, level with 1, below 23 of the other 46: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit weight122 g124 gAbove 21 and below 25 of the other 46: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationFruit firmness58.7 N58.9 NAbove 20 and below 24 of the other 44: lower middle
The USDA-PGRU germplasm characterisationStarch pattern index7.9 SPI8.0 SPIAbove 17, level with 2, below 25 of the other 44: lower middle

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

USDA-PGRU Malus germplasm characterisation

USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, in the Finger Lakes region of western New York State · 2017 · Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Humid continental, with cold winters and warm summers moderated by the Finger Lakes — a sharper seasonal swing than any of the European cider regions whose fruit the collection holds, and warm enough in late summer to bring acid down faster than a maritime autumn does.

Held as
PI 175548, held as “Tardive Forestier”

One harvest season. Fruit assessed for weight, diameter, starch pattern index on the Cornell 1–8 chart and flesh firmness by penetrometer; juice pressed and measured for soluble solids by refractometer, titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.1 as malic acid, pH as the autotitrator’s starting reading on juice that had been frozen, total phenolics by Folin–Ciocalteu assay as gallic acid equivalent, and glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol by enzymatic assay.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Very late
Flowering
Pollination group 5
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Good

43 other cultivars on this site with a recorded group could pollinate it — diploids flowering in group 5 or a group either side. See which, with their class and harvest window.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Not a tradition, though its sugar would support one.

About Tardive Forestier

Tardive Forestier is one of a set of Norman cultivars whose identity is essentially a harvest date. It is late, it is a bittersweet, it accumulates good sugar through a long autumn hang, and it was kept because a farm needed fruit at that point in the season.

The value of a very late cultivar is easy to underestimate from a modern perspective. A grower with cold storage and a fast press can pick everything in three weeks and mill it at leisure; a grower with neither had to spread the work across the autumn, and the shape of the traditional orchard — a succession of cultivars ripening from September to December — was a response to that constraint rather than a stylistic choice.

It has become uncommon as the constraint disappeared. Its record is thin, its analysis unverified, and its main claim on a reader’s attention is as an example of how orchard logistics shaped which apples survived.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

Tardive is a season and Forestier a surname, so the name reads as “Forestier’s late one”. That pattern usually means a local selection named by neighbours.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.