Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Sheep’s Nose

A name given to several distinct elongated English apples, at least one of which is a Three Counties cider fruit — an identity problem rather than a single cultivar.

Also written Sheeps Nose, Sheep’s Snout, Sheepsnose.

Classification
Sharp — Long Ashton classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Not suited to a single-varietal cider
Blend role
Acid lift, Bulk juice
Origin
England, various counties
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Moderate
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Moderate

How it is classified

Long Ashton classification

Sharp

High acid, low tannin. Includes both purpose-grown sharps and many culinary apples.

Basis: Above about 0.45% w/v acid and below about 0.2% w/v tannin.

Fruit grown under this name in the Three Counties is generally described as a sharp. Because the name covers several cultivars this placement describes one usage and cannot be treated as settled.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidModerate
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessSlight
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: description rather than analysis

Description of fruit grown under this name, with wide bands throughout because the name covers more than one cultivar and the accounts do not agree.

Contributes acid in a mixed blend; the specific character depends on which Sheep’s Nose is meant.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Sheep’s Nose, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Sheep’s Nose into a blend

Measured analysis

No analysis recorded

CiderHQ holds no sourced juice analysis for Sheep’s Nose. Figures for this cultivar circulate, but they reach the present through compilation rather than through the original tables, and publishing a number we cannot attribute would give it an authority it has not earned. What is known about how the fruit behaves is described above and below.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Moderate
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Moderate

October, though this varies with which fruit is intended.

Not recorded, and the name covers more than one cultivar.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Scabmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Not suited to a single-varietal cider

Not a defined enough entity to make a named varietal from.

About Sheep’s Nose

Sheep’s Nose is a shape, not a cultivar. Long, tapering apples have been called this in Herefordshire, in Devon, in Derbyshire and elsewhere, and the resulting fruits are not related to each other. Some are culinary, some are cider fruit, and at least one is a dessert apple.

The record here covers the Three Counties usage, where the name attaches to a sharp cider fruit used in mixed farm blends. It carries wide bands and no measurements, because narrowing them would require deciding which apple is meant and there is no basis for deciding.

The general point matters more than this particular fruit. A substantial fraction of English apple names describe an appearance, and descriptive names get reinvented independently in different places. Where a record cannot resolve which fruit a name denotes, saying so is more useful than picking one.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

The name is descriptive and has been applied independently in Herefordshire, Devon, Derbyshire and elsewhere to apples with an elongated, tapering shape. It does not denote one cultivar and no single origin can be given.

Other names this fruit is known by. Each is a name for the same cultivar, not a separate one — which is why none of them has a page of its own.
NameKindNote
Sheep’s SnoutHistoric spellingA variant of the same descriptive name, applied to the same range of long-shaped apples.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Traditional record Evidence standard for this record. What that means.