Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Stayman Winesap

A Kansas-raised Winesap seedling from the 1860s, larger and juicier than its parent, widely planted in the mid-Atlantic and used in cider for acid with a little colour and grip.

Also written Stayman, Stayman’s Winesap.

Classification
Not classified under any recorded system
Harvest
Late (Late October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Acid lift, Bulk juice
Origin
Leavenworth, Kansas
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

How it is classified

No recorded classification

No classification scheme has been recorded for Stayman Winesap. That is common outside Europe: the English, French and Spanish systems were each built for their own fruit, and a cultivar grown where none of them applies simply has no class. What the fruit contributes to a blend is described below regardless — the class is a shorthand for that, not a substitute.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidHigh
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessNone
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: its recorded classification

Descriptive record of a Winesap seedling with comparable acid and greater juice volume. No modern per-cultivar analysis is held in CiderHQ’s register. These bands were authored from description; published analyses of this fruit have since been transcribed onto the record from named trial programmes and are shown above. The bands are not derived from those figures, which is why this profile is marked as classified rather than measured.

Winey and firmly sharp like its parent, with a softer texture and a fuller, less concentrated juice.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Stayman Winesap, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Stayman Winesap into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Measured on the fruit

Measured on the fruit itself, before anything was done to it. These figures hold whatever was later made from the juice.

Reported analyses of Stayman Winesap, by property and source — measured on the fruit
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Fruit diameter76 mm (71–81)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit firmness58.0 N (47.5–68.4)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Fruit weight201 g (162–240)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Starch pattern index8.0 SPIUSDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Measured on the juice

Measured on juice as pressed, before fermentation. This is where most cider analysis lives and what the classification schemes are defined on.

Reported analyses of Stayman Winesap, by property and source — measured on the juice
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Brix2 readings, spanning 12.5–13.3 °Bx12.5 °Bx (10.6–14.5)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
13.3 °BxWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
pH2 readings, spanning 3.62–3.65 pH3.65 pH (3.53–3.77)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
3.62 pHWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Titratable acidity2 readings, spanning 4.3–7.4 g/L4.3 g/L (3.2–5.5)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
7.4 g/LWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Total phenolics2 readings, spanning 253.0–650.0 mg/L650.0 mg/L (600.0–700.0)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
253.0 mg/LWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Fructose81.9 g/L (73.9–89.9)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Glucose31.0 g/L (25.7–36.3)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sorbitol21.5 g/L (18.2–24.8)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit
Sucrose37.8 g/L (34.5–41.1)USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, USA2017Modern analysisCornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

4 properties here have been measured more than once. The readings are shown as they were taken and are deliberately not averaged — climate, season, ripeness at picking, the age of the tree and the analytical method all move these numbers, and a single figure would hide every one of them. Where a spread is given below a property, it is the distance between separate studies, not the variation within any one of them.

How these were measured
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range. Published to two decimal places and shown at the precision CiderHQ displays for the unit.
  • Mean of the fruit sampled per accession; where a bracket is shown it is one standard deviation either side of the mean, not the observed range.
  • Cornell generic starch–iodine chart, 1–8, where 1 is no hydrolysis and 8 is complete. Mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of it.
  • Penetrometer, mean of replicate fruit; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Refractometer on pressed juice. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Titration to pH 8.2 with sodium hydroxide, reported as malic acid equivalents. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Meter on pressed juice before fermentation. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Löwenthal permanganate titration, reported by the source as grams per litre of tannic acid equivalent and stored here as milligrams per litre by exact conversion so that it sits in one column with the Folin–Ciocalteu figures the site also holds. The two methods do not measure the same thing and are not interchangeable.
  • Enzymatic assay (Megazyme). Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • D-sorbitol/xylitol assay kit (Megazyme), sorbitol dehydrogenase method. Mean of replicates; a bracket, where shown, is one standard deviation either side of the mean.
  • Refractometer on pressed juice.
  • Meter on pressed juice.
  • Titration, reported as malic acid. Published to two decimal places and shown at the one the site displays.
  • Folin–Ciocalteu, reported as gallic acid equivalents.
  • A chart position, not a quantity. Almost every accession here scored at or near 8, which says the fruit was picked at or past full starch conversion rather than that the cultivars are alike.
  • One harvest at one site. Soluble solids move several degrees between seasons and with crop load.
  • A permanganate figure and a Folin–Ciocalteu figure for the same juice can differ by a factor of two. Compare this reading with other permanganate readings, not with a Folin one.
  • A Folin–Ciocalteu figure in gallic acid equivalents. It is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate “tannin” figure: the two assays respond to different things and can differ by a factor of two on the same juice.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

USDA-PGRU Malus germplasm characterisation

USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, New York, in the Finger Lakes region of western New York State · 2017 · Cornell University / USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit

Humid continental, with cold winters and warm summers moderated by the Finger Lakes — a sharper seasonal swing than any of the European cider regions whose fruit the collection holds, and warm enough in late summer to bring acid down faster than a maritime autumn does.

Held as
PI 588975, held as “Stayman”

One harvest season. Fruit assessed for weight, diameter, starch pattern index on the Cornell 1–8 chart and flesh firmness by penetrometer; juice pressed and measured for soluble solids by refractometer, titratable acidity by titration to pH 8.2 as malic acid, pH by meter, total phenolics by Löwenthal permanganate titration as tannic acid equivalent, and glucose, fructose, sucrose and sorbitol by enzymatic assay.

Virginia cultivar polyphenol characterisation

Winchester, in the northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia · 2012–2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Humid subtropical shading into continental, with hot summers — warm enough that acid falls faster through the ripening period than it does in a maritime autumn, which is part of why the titratable acidities here run lower than English figures for comparable fruit.

Held as
Listed as “Stayman”

Soluble solids by refractometer, pH by meter, titratable acidity by titration as malic acid, total polyphenols by Folin–Ciocalteu as gallic acid equivalents. Twenty cultivars, one site.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Late
Flowering
triploid
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

Triploid, so it neither pollinates others nor sets reliably without two compatible diploids nearby.

Triploid

A triploid carries three sets of chromosomes rather than two, and its pollen is effectively sterile. It cannot pollinate another tree and needs two compatible pollinators of its own, which is a real constraint on how an orchard containing it has to be planted.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Fruit crackinghighNotoriously prone to skin cracking in wet autumns, which is a serious defect for market fruit and largely irrelevant for pressing fruit.
Fire blightmoderate

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

It carries less concentration than Winesap and has no structure of its own; a single-varietal Stayman is thinner than the parent and rarely made deliberately.

About Stayman Winesap

Stayman is the commercially successful child of a cider-named apple, and its career says something about what American orchards actually optimised for. It is larger and juicier than Winesap and easier to sell, and it displaced its parent across the mid-Atlantic. That it cracks badly in a wet autumn was tolerated because the sound fruit paid, and the cracked fruit went to the press.

That last point is worth stating plainly, because it describes a great deal of North American cider that no cultivar record usually captures. Through most of the twentieth century the juice pressed in the United States was not selected fruit at all; it was the culls, drops and cracked fruit from a market crop, pressed for the unfermented sweet-cider trade. A cultivar’s significance to cider in that period is often a function of how much of it failed to make grade.

As a blending fruit Stayman offers acid, a little colour and not much else. It is triploid, which complicates a planting block, and its juice is a diluted version of Winesap’s. Modern makers who use it are generally using what a neighbouring orchard has, which is exactly how most North American blends have always been composed.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · documented

Raised by Dr Joseph Stayman, who recorded the sowing; one of the better-documented American origins of the nineteenth century.

Parentage · a recorded cross

Raised from Winesap seed; the pollen parent is unknown. Recorded as a cross by the breeding programme that made it, which is strong evidence about what was intended and weaker evidence about which pollen took; no genotyping study CiderHQ has read confirms it.

The breeding programme recorded making this cross. Strong evidence about what was intended; weaker evidence about which pollen actually took, which only genotyping settles.

Other names this fruit is known by. Each is a name for the same cultivar, not a separate one — which is why none of them has a page of its own.
NameKindNote
StaymanTrade nameThe short form used commercially, and increasingly the standard name as the Winesap association became a marketing liability rather than a description.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Parentage

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.