Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Juice treatment

Sulphiting

Adding sulphur dioxide to juice to suppress spoilage organisms and oxidative browning, at a level that only means anything once the juice pH is known.

Also called SO2 addition, Sulphur dioxide treatment.

Stage
Juice treatment
Traditional in
No single tradition — used wherever it suits
What it most changes
Oxidative character down, fermentation character down
Safety
Carries a safety consideration — see below
Safety — read this before doing it

The correct addition depends on juice pH, and a level appropriate to a sharp juice can be substantially under-effective in a low-acid bittersweet one — which is why pH is measured before the decision rather than after it. Maximum permitted levels in the finished drink, and the threshold above which sulphites must be declared on the label, are set by law and differ between jurisdictions. Sulphite sensitivity is a recognised adverse reaction in some people, notably some with asthma. Handling metabisulphite powder releases an irritant gas that should not be inhaled, and it is dissolved in a ventilated space. CiderHQ does not publish addition rates: they are pH-dependent and jurisdiction-dependent, and a figure without its context is worse than none.

What it is

Sulphiting is the addition of sulphur dioxide to juice, normally as potassium metabisulphite dissolved in a little of the juice itself, occasionally as gas or as a solution of the salt. It does three separable things: it inhibits bacteria and the more fragile wild yeasts, it inactivates polyphenol oxidase and so slows enzymatic browning, and it scavenges oxygen and binds acetaldehyde. It is the most widely used intervention in juice treatment and also the most widely misunderstood, because the quantity added tells you almost nothing on its own — what governs the effect is how much of it exists as molecular SO2, and that depends on the pH of the juice.

Molecular sulphur dioxide against pHThe share of free sulphur dioxide that exists as the active molecular form, calculated across the pH range cider occupies.Molecular SO₂ as % of free02463.03.23.43.63.84.0Juice pH6.1%0.6%To hold 0.8 mg/L molecularneeds 13 mg/L free at pH 3.0and 125 mg/L free at pH 4.0
The share of free sulphur dioxide that exists as the active molecular form, calculated across the pH range cider occupies.
Described in full
What is plotted
The vertical axis is molecular sulphur dioxide as a percentage of free sulphur dioxide. The horizontal axis is juice pH, from 3.0 to 4.0. The curve is calculated, not sketched: the molecular fraction is one divided by one plus ten to the power of pH minus 1.81.
Why only the molecular form counts
Free sulphur dioxide is a mixture of molecular SO₂ and bisulphite. Only the molecular form is antimicrobial. Measuring free sulphite therefore tells you how much you added, not how much is working.
The shape of the curve
It falls steeply and then flattens. At pH 3.0 about six percent of the free sulphite is molecular; by pH 4.0 it is about six tenths of one percent. The active fraction falls roughly tenfold across one pH unit.
What that means in practice
To hold the commonly used protective level of 0.8 mg/L molecular SO₂ needs about 13 mg/L free sulphite at pH 3.0, about 50 mg/L at pH 3.6, and about 125 mg/L at pH 4.0.
Why bittersweet juice is the hard case
Low-acid bittersweet fruit ferments at a high pH, exactly where sulphite is least effective, and where the sulphite dose required approaches or exceeds legal and sensory limits. This is a large part of why sharp fruit is blended in.
The 1.81 in the expression
It is the first acid dissociation constant of sulphurous acid, expressed as pKa. The equation is the Henderson–Hasselbalch relationship applied to that equilibrium, which is why the curve is a property of the chemistry rather than an empirical fit.
A caution
Bound sulphite is not shown at all. A substantial fraction of any addition binds irreversibly to acetaldehyde and other carbonyls and never contributes to the free figure, so the dose added always exceeds the free level measured afterwards.

Why it is used

How it works

What it changes

The direction this step pushes the finished drink in, dimension by dimension. A direction, not a measurement: how far it moves depends on the juice, the temperature and how the step is carried out.

Effect on each sensory dimension. Hover or focus a dimension name for what that dimension means on CiderHQ.
DimensionDirectionWhy
FreshnessPreservesSuppressing oxidase activity keeps the volatile esters and aldehydes responsible for fresh-fruit aroma in the juice rather than allowing them to be lost with the browning reaction.
Oxidative characterLowersSulphite reduces the quinones formed by polyphenol oxidase back to phenols and binds acetaldehyde, so the browning and the aldehydic note that go with it do not develop.
Fermentation characterLowersThe non-Saccharomyces yeasts responsible for much of the ester and volatile complexity of a spontaneous ferment are more sulphite-sensitive than Saccharomyces, so their contribution is reduced.
Phenolic characterPreservesPhenolic material that would otherwise oxidise, polymerise and precipitate stays in solution, so the finished cider retains more of the tannin the fruit carried.

The chemistry and the organisms

What is actually being changed, and by what. Each entry says what that compound or organism does in cider generally; this page is one place it does it.

Compounds involved

Organisms involved

What it is done with

What can go wrong

Faults that begin at this step, or that this step makes more likely. Each one is set out with its causes and whether it can be put right.

Styles it produces

Categories in which this step is characteristic or required. Some name it in their definition; for others it is simply how they have always been made.

Recorded figures

Shown with the place, period and method each was taken under, and never averaged: the same step run in another cellar genuinely gives a different number.

pH3.00–3.80 pH

Cider juice generally, 2026 · Not a measurement of a sample: the range over which the molecular fraction of sulphur dioxide falls by roughly an order of magnitude, from the dissociation constant of sulphurous acid. · Andrew Lea

A property of the chemistry rather than of any juice. At pH 3.0 something like six per cent of free sulphur dioxide is in the active molecular form; at pH 3.8 it is under one per cent. This is why a sulphite dose calculated without a pH reading is a guess.

Acid strength, which governs microbial risk and sulphite effectiveness. Measured in ph.

More on sulphiting

The single most important thing about sulphite in cider is that the number on the bag is not the number that matters. Sulphur dioxide in solution partitions between molecular SO2, the bisulphite ion and the sulphite ion, and the position of that equilibrium is set by pH. Only molecular SO2 passes readily into a microbial cell, so it is the fraction that does the antimicrobial work, and it makes up a rapidly diminishing share of the total as pH climbs. Cider is where this matters more than in almost any other fermented drink, because cider juice spans an unusually wide pH range: a sharp English or Asturian juice and a low-acid Herefordshire or Norman bittersweet juice can sit far enough apart that the same addition gives protection in one and very little in the other. A maker who sulphites by volume without measuring pH is not dosing, they are guessing.

The second complication is binding. A substantial part of any addition combines within hours with acetaldehyde, with keto-acids and with sugars, and the bound fraction is no longer antimicrobial. It still counts as total SO2 for legal and labelling purposes, so a cider can simultaneously carry a high total figure and be effectively unprotected. This is why free and total SO2 are measured separately, and why juice from bruised, oxidised or partly fermented fruit — which is already rich in acetaldehyde — consumes far more sulphite to reach the same free level than sound fresh juice does. Sulphiting late, after browning has begun, is expensive and only partly effective.

Practice diverges sharply along traditional lines, and the divergence is not simply modern-versus-old. Asturian sidra natural and the French cider AOCs are built around spontaneous fermentation by the fruit’s own microflora, and heavy sulphiting is incompatible with that: it removes precisely the non-Saccharomyces yeasts and lactic acid bacteria whose activity defines the style. Much English commercial practice, by contrast, treats sulphiting at the press as routine, because it is producing a consistent product from fruit of variable condition on a schedule. Modern North American craft practice tends to sulphite as a matter of course and inoculate afterwards, while a growing minority works unsulphited and accepts the risk. German Apfelwein practice sits between. None of these is the default from which the others deviate.

When it goes wrong it goes wrong in both directions. Too little, in a low-acid juice, and the protection is nominal: acetic acid bacteria establish, volatile acidity climbs, and lactic acid bacteria may produce mousiness or, in the presence of glycerol, the acrolein bitterness that no amount of blending will fix. Too much, and the ferment is sluggish or sticks outright, sulphidic notes appear, the drink smells of struck match, and the sensory penalty persists because bound SO2 releases slowly. The subtler cost is that a well-sulphited juice ferments into a cleaner but narrower cider: the aromatic complexity that the early wild yeasts contribute is simply not there. That is a legitimate trade, but it should be made knowingly rather than by habit.

Related processes

Steps that sit alongside this one, replace it, or depend on it having been done.

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.