Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Reinette Obry

A French sharp apple measured twice by English programmes forty years apart, and one of the few cultivars where two independent tables agree closely.

Also written Reinette Obri, Obry.

Classification
Sharp — Long Ashton classification
Harvest
Mid (Late September to mid October)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Acid lift
Origin
France
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Moderate
Biennial bearing
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

How it is classified

Long Ashton classification

Sharp

High acid, low tannin. Includes both purpose-grown sharps and many culinary apples.

Basis: Above about 0.45% w/v acid and below about 0.2% w/v tannin.

Long Ashton recorded 0.63% acid and 0.13% tannin — above the 0.45% acid threshold and well below the tannin one, which is the definition of a sharp.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidVery high
TanninLight
SugarModerate
BitternessSlight
AstringencySlight
AromaPresent
BodyMedium
Based on: published analysis

Two independent English analyses that agree closely: the Long Ashton composite at 0.63% acid and 0.13% tannin, and a National Association of Cider Makers compilation at 0.60% acid, 0.09% tannin, SG 1.045 and pH 3.50.

A clean, sharp juice with almost no tannin — the classic corrective to a bittersweet-heavy blend.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Reinette Obry, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Reinette Obry into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Reported analyses of Reinette Obry, by property and source
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Total acid2 readings, spanning 0.600–0.630 % w/v0.630 % w/vLong Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, Somerset, England1905–1975Historic analysisAndrew Lea
0.600 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
Total tannin2 readings, spanning 0.090–0.130 % w/v0.130 % w/vLong Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, Somerset, England1905–1975Historic analysisAndrew Lea
0.090 % w/vEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
pH3.50 pHEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology
Specific gravity1.045 SGEngland — the source does not name the orchards1922–1977Historic analysisNational Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

2 properties here have been measured more than once. The readings are shown as they were taken and are deliberately not averaged — climate, season, ripeness at picking, the age of the tree and the analytical method all move these numbers, and a single figure would hide every one of them. Where a spread is given below a property, it is the distance between separate studies, not the variation within any one of them.

How these were measured
  • Titration with alkali, reported as malic acid. Composite figure across many seasons; the source states neither the sample count nor the year of any individual analysis.
  • Löwenthal permanganate titration, reported as tannic acid equivalent. Composite figure across many seasons; the source states neither the sample count nor the year of any individual analysis.
  • Published in the two-figure form the table uses (a printed 51 meaning 1.051) and written here in full.
  • Titration, reported as malic acid, on juice from freshly harvested fruit.
  • Method not stated in the compilation; the Long Ashton work behind it used Löwenthal permanganate titration.
  • Meter on juice from freshly harvested fruit.
  • A composite of Long Ashton analyses reaching CiderHQ through three hands: the station’s own work, a printed compilation (Bulmer’s Pomona, 1987, and Beech and Carr, 1977), and a transcription of that compilation. CiderHQ has seen only the transcription.
  • A composite of Long Ashton analyses reaching CiderHQ through three hands: the station’s own work, a printed compilation (Bulmer’s Pomona, 1987, and Beech and Carr, 1977), and a transcription of that compilation. CiderHQ has seen only the transcription. A permanganate figure. It is not comparable with a Folin–Ciocalteu total-phenolics figure for the same fruit, and the two can differ by a factor of two.
  • A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three.
  • A National Association of Cider Makers compilation crediting three bodies of work — MAFF/ADAS acidity and pH from freshly harvested fruit, Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties reported in 1977, and the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. The compilation does not say which row came from which, so no row can be dated more precisely than the span of the three. Several cultivars appear more than once in this table under sample numbers, and the repeats are far apart: Bramley’s acid is 1.21, 1.05 and 1.43 per cent in three rows. Read any single row as one pressing of one parcel of fruit.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Long Ashton composite cider apple analyses

Long Ashton Research Station, near Bristol, North Somerset, England · 1905–1975 · Andrew Lea

Maritime and mild, with wet autumns and few hard frosts — the climate the English cider cultivars were selected in, and the reason their acid and tannin figures here are the ones the rest of the world has spent a century comparing its own fruit against.

Held as
Listed as “Reinette Obry”, mid season

Filed here as sharp.

Freshly expressed juice, not finished cider. Acid by straight titration against alkali, reported as malic acid; tannin by Löwenthal permanganate titration, reported as tannic acid equivalent. Composite figures across seventy years of analyses: the source gives neither a sample count nor the year of any individual reading.

Typical English apple juice analyses

England — the compilation does not name the orchards · 1922–1977 · National Association of Cider Makers, Archive of Cider Pomology

English fruit-growing country, and no closer than that: the source gives neither site nor season for any individual row, which is a real limit on what the figures can be asked to do.

Held as
Listed as “Reinette Obry”

Juice from freshly harvested fruit. Acidity and pH credited to MAFF/ADAS; the remainder to Long Ashton cider-making trials with dessert and culinary varieties (1977) and to the Long Ashton Annual Report for 1922. Specific gravity is printed in a two-figure form and written out in full here.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Mid
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Moderate
Cropping
Slightly biennial
Keeping
Good

Mid-season in the Long Ashton table.

Reinettes as a group are long-keeping, firm-fleshed apples, which is most of what the name conveys.

Not recorded in any source CiderHQ has verified.

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

Sharp with little tannin gives a thin cider on its own. Fruit of this class earns its place by what it does to a blend.

About Reinette Obry

Reinette Obry is a French sharp apple, and it appears here because two separate English programmes measured it and agreed. The Long Ashton composite gives 0.63 per cent acid and 0.13 per cent tannin; a National Association of Cider Makers compilation of English juice analyses, drawing on Ministry work and on Long Ashton trials reported in 1977, gives 0.60 per cent acid, 0.09 per cent tannin, a gravity of 1.045 and a pH of 3.50.

Agreement of that closeness is rarer in this data than a reader might expect. The same compilation records Bramley three times — 1.21, 1.05 and 1.43 per cent acid — and the modern surveys routinely find a variety differing more between two of its own seasons than between itself and a different variety. Two independent analyses landing within three hundredths of a per cent is therefore evidence of something: either that this cultivar is unusually stable, or that both readings came from similar fruit in similar conditions, and the record cannot say which.

What it is for is acid. A West Country blend built on bittersweets carries very little acid and sits at a pH where spoilage organisms are comfortable, and the traditional correction is to add sharp fruit. A reinette at 0.6 per cent acid and pH 3.5 does that job without bringing tannin that would compete with the bittersweets already in the vat.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · traditional account

A French reinette. The reinette group is large, old and only loosely defined — the word denotes a russeted, firm, long-keeping dessert-type apple rather than a family with a common ancestor — and Obry is presumably the name of a grower or a place.

Why it matters

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Expert reference Evidence standard for this record. What that means.