Skip to content
CiderHQ
Search

Cider apple

Fuji

A Japanese cross of Ralls Janet and Red Delicious released in 1962, exceptionally sweet and dense and very low in acid, now among the most planted apples in the world and a very large contributor of sugar to modern cider.

Also written Fuji.

Classification
Sweet — Long Ashton classification
Harvest
Very late (November onwards)
Single varietal
Rarely bottled on its own
Blend role
Sugar and body, Bulk juice
Origin
The national horticultural research station at Morioka, Iwate prefecture, Japan
Species
Malus domestica
Vigour
Vigorous
Biennial bearing
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

How it is classified

Long Ashton classification

Sweet

Low acid and low tannin. Fruit that contributes sugar, alcohol and body but little structure or sharpness.

Basis: Below about 0.45% w/v acid and below about 0.2% w/v tannin.

Assessed in Fruit grown in western Washington State.

Low acid with no tannin. Its very high sugar is not something the scheme records, which is again the limitation rather than the result.

Every classification on CiderHQ names its system. Why there is more than one.

What it contributes to a blend

A direction, not a measurement. These bands are the level of resolution the evidence supports, and they say which way adding this fruit pushes a blend rather than what the finished cider will be.

Contribution to a blend, scored 1–5 as a band. The filled segment is the typical value; the paler segments are the range.
AxisTypicalRange
AcidVery low
TanninNegligible
SugarVery high
BitternessNone
AstringencyNone
AromaRestrained
BodyMedium
Based on: published analysis

WSU acid and Brix figures from Washington fruit, with the phenolic axes at the floor.

Very sweet, dense and crisp, with a mild honeyed character and an acidity so low that the sweetness has nothing to push against.

Aroma

No aroma descriptors are recorded for Fuji, and for a great deal of cider fruit that is a finding rather than a gap. Bittersweet apples in particular contribute tannin, sugar and body while being close to aromatically mute, and most of what a cider made from them smells of was produced by the fermentation rather than carried in by the fruit. CiderHQ publishes the absence rather than filling the space with descriptors nothing supports.

Put Fuji into a blend

Measured analysis

Each figure is shown with where and when it was taken. They are not averaged: the same cultivar grown in another climate genuinely gives different numbers, and collapsing them into one would be the most misleading thing this page could do.

Reported analyses of Fuji, by property and source
PropertyReadingWhereWhenSource
Brix2 readings, spanning 14.6–16.0 °Bx14.0–18.0 °BxMount Vernon, Washington State2010sModern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
14.6 °BxWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
pH4.11 pHWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Titratable acidity4.6 g/LWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Total acid0.200–0.400 % w/vMount Vernon, Washington State2010sModern analysisWashington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center
Total phenolics238.0 mg/LWinchester, Virginia, USA2012–2013Modern analysisJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

One property here has been measured more than once. The readings are shown as they were taken and are deliberately not averaged — climate, season, ripeness at picking, the age of the tree and the analytical method all move these numbers, and a single figure would hide every one of them. Where a spread is given below a property, it is the distance between separate studies, not the variation within any one of them.

How these were measured
  • Refractometer on pressed juice.
  • Meter on pressed juice.
  • Titration, reported as malic acid. Published to two decimal places and shown at the one the site displays.
  • Folin–Ciocalteu, reported as gallic acid equivalents.
  • Reported as malic acid. Low enough that a Fuji-dominated juice needs acid correction for safety as well as for palate.
  • Refractometric, and among the highest of any commercial dessert apple. Fuji is genuinely a high-sugar fruit, which is why it is worth having in a blend despite the acid problem.
  • A Folin–Ciocalteu figure in gallic acid equivalents. It is not interchangeable with a Löwenthal permanganate “tannin” figure: the two assays respond to different things and can differ by a factor of two on the same juice.

Compare within a study to see where these figures sat among the other cultivars the same work analysed — which is a more robust statement than the figures themselves, because absolute values move between laboratories and the ordering inside one study mostly survives.

Watched in the orchard

What named research programmes recorded about this fruit at their own sites. Bloom, harvest and cropping belong to a place and a run of seasons rather than to a cultivar, so they are reported site by site rather than merged.

Virginia cultivar polyphenol characterisation

Winchester, in the northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia · 2012–2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Humid subtropical shading into continental, with hot summers — warm enough that acid falls faster through the ripening period than it does in a maritime autumn, which is part of why the titratable acidities here run lower than English figures for comparable fruit.

Held as
Listed as “Fuji”

Soluble solids by refractometer, pH by meter, titratable acidity by titration as malic acid, total polyphenols by Folin–Ciocalteu as gallic acid equivalents. Twenty cultivars, one site.

In the orchard

Harvest window
Very late
Flowering
Not recorded
Vigour
Vigorous
Cropping
Markedly biennial — heavy and light years alternate
Keeping
Very good — holds in store for weeks

A long-season cultivar picked at the very end of the crop; it needs the whole autumn to accumulate the sugar it is grown for.

Strongly biennial without careful thinning.

Exceptional storage life, and it retains its texture longer than almost any other cultivar.

Disease and pest susceptibility

Recorded susceptibility. Pressure differs enormously by region and by season, so these are tendencies rather than predictions.
IssueSusceptibilityNote
Fire blighthighMarkedly blight-prone, a serious constraint in North American plantings.
Apple scabmoderate
Requires a long growing seasonhigh

Juice and pressing

How it is used

On its own

Rarely bottled on its own

The sugar makes a substantial, alcoholic cider and the absence of acid makes it flabby and vulnerable. Where it is made single-varietal, acid is generally added or a sharp cultivar is blended in and the label kept quiet about it.

About Fuji

Fuji is a Japanese apple with two American parents, and its rise is the clearest single illustration of how thoroughly the modern apple crop has become a global one. Crossed at Morioka in 1939 from a Virginian farm apple and an Iowa chance seedling, released in 1962, it is now planted in China on a scale that dwarfs every other apple crop in history, and grown commercially in the United States, Chile, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.

For a cider maker the balance sheet is stark and useful. On the credit side, very high sugar — Fuji reaches Brix levels that few dessert apples approach, and a blend containing it ferments to a genuinely higher alcohol. On the debit side, extremely low acid, no tannin, and very little aroma. It contributes gravity and dilutes everything else.

The low acid is a production problem before it is a flavour one, in the same way it is for Red Delicious. A juice heavy in Fuji ferments at a pH where sulphite is less effective and spoilage organisms are at home, and a maker has to correct it — with a sharp cultivar if one is available, with added malic acid if not. Blending in this context is not an aesthetic refinement; it is how the ferment is kept sound.

That is the point this section of the file exists to make. The large majority of cider made in the world today is made from fruit like Fuji, Gala, Golden Delicious and Granny Smith, in proportions decided by what a national orchard industry happens to grow. It is not a corrupted version of a West Country tradition; it is a different practice with different inputs and different constraints, and describing it accurately — including where it is thin, and where it needs correcting — is more useful to a reader than either celebrating it or pretending it is not there.

Names, origin and identity

Cultivar naming is the hardest problem in cider fruit data. The same tree carries different names across ten miles, and two different trees have shared a name for two centuries.

Origin · documented

A documented institutional cross. Fuji is included in this family rather than a European one because both its parents are North American and its commercial life is overwhelmingly a Pacific and southern-hemisphere one.

Parentage · a recorded cross

Recorded as a cross by the breeding programme that made it, which is strong evidence about what was intended and weaker evidence about which pollen took; no genotyping study CiderHQ has read confirms it.

The breeding programme recorded making this cross. Strong evidence about what was intended; weaker evidence about which pollen actually took, which only genotyping settles.

Related cultivars

Recorded relationships, including the ones this fruit is routinely confused with.

Parentage

Fruit that plays a similar part

Cultivars sharing a classification under the same system and a comparable role in a blend. Not a similarity score — a stated relationship.

Where it grows

What people ask next

Questions readers ask about the things this page mentions. Each one goes to the section that answers it rather than to a page written to receive the question.

Where to go next

Sources

What this page rests on. Where a source is marked as registered rather than read, CiderHQ is recording that the body is authoritative on the subject without claiming to have worked through the document itself. See our evidence policy for what each state means.

Research Evidence standard for this record. What that means.